35 t/h 纯燃超低挥发分碳基燃料预热燃烧锅炉运行特性研究

华电技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 50-56.

35 t/h 纯燃超低挥发分碳基燃料预热燃烧锅炉运行特性研究

1.中国科学院工程热物理研究所，北京 100190；2.中国科学院大学，北京 100049；3.中国科学院洁净能源创新研究院，辽宁大连 116023；4.陕西煤业新型能源科技股份有限公司，西安 710100

出版日期:2020-07-24 发布日期:2020-07-24

Study on operation characteristics of a 35 t/h preheating combustion boiler with pure ultra-low volatile carbon-based fuels

1.Institute of Engineering Thermophysics，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100190，China；2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100049，China；3.Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy，Dalian 116023，China； 4.Shaanxi Coal Industry New Energy Technology Company Limited ，Xi´an 710100，China

Online:2020-07-24 Published:2020-07-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 低阶煤热解和气化后会产生热解半焦和气化残炭等超低挥发分碳基燃料，为解决超低挥发分碳基燃料着火稳燃难、燃尽难和污染物排放水平高等问题，在35 t/h工业煤粉锅炉上增加了预热燃烧器以及相关辅助系统，建成了 35 t/h纯燃超低挥发分碳基燃料预热燃烧锅炉。在该锅炉上以神木烟煤、神木半焦和气化残炭为燃料进行试验，研究燃料种类、预热温度、二次风当量比和锅炉负荷对锅炉燃烧特性及污染物排放特性的影响。结果表明：3种燃料在35 t/h纯燃超低挥发分碳基燃料预热燃烧锅炉中都可以稳定燃烧，即使干燥无灰基挥发分为4.30%的半焦粉也能稳定地纯燃，表明预热燃烧技术具有很好的燃料适应性；3种燃料通过预热后进行燃烧，燃烧效率均超过99%；随着预热温度的增加炉膛的整体温度有所升高，NOx排放呈现先降低后增加的趋势，说明预热温度升高有利于预热后的燃料在炉膛中燃烧放热，预热温度为 887 ℃ 时，NOx排放质量浓度达到最低值 110.6 mg/m（3 标态，φ（O2）=9%）；预热燃烧锅炉低负荷下的稳燃特性较好，负荷越低 NOx排放质量浓度越低，最低可达 108.0 mg/m（3 标态，φ（O2）= 9%），体现了预热燃烧技术在稳燃、燃尽和低NOx排放上的优势。

关键词: 超低挥发分, 碳基燃料, 半焦, 气化残炭, 预热燃烧器, 锅炉, NOx排放, 燃烧效率

Abstract: Ultra-low volatile carbon-based fuels，such as semi-coke and gasified residual carbon，are produced in pyrolysis and gasification of low-rank coal.A preheating combustor and auxiliary systems were installed on a 35 t/h coal-fired boiler combusting pure ultra-low volatile carbon-based fuels，so as to stabilize and enhance the burning of ultra-low volatile carbon-based fuels and lower the emission of pollutants. In the experiments carried out on the boiler，using Shenmu bituminous coal，Shenmu semi-coke and gasified residual carbon，effects of fuel type，preheating temperature，secondary air equivalent ratio and boiler load on combustion characteristics and pollutant emission were studied. The results showed that the three fuels can burn stably，and so can the pure semi-coke powder with dry ash-free volatilization fraction of 4.30%，which indicated the good fuel adaptability of the boiler. Been preheated，all the combustion efficiencies of the three fuels exceeded 99%. With the rise of preheating temperature，the overall temperature of the furnace increased，and the NOx emission mass concentration decreased first and then increased，indicating that the increase of preheating temperature was conducive to the combustion and heat release of preheated fuel in the furnace.When the preheating temperature was 887 ℃，the minimum NOx emission mass concentration was 110.6 mg/m（3 standard state，φ（O2）=9%）.The preheated boiler has good combustion stability under low loads. As boiler load is lower，the NOx emission decreased and bottomed at 108.0 mg/m3（standard state，φ（O2）=9%），which reflects the advantages of preheating combustion technology in stabilizing combustion，burnout and low NOx emission.

Key words: ultra-low volatile, carbon-based fuel, semicoke, gasified residual carbon, preheating combustor, boiler, NOx emission, combustion efficiency

欧阳子区1，2，满承波1，李增林4，李诗媛1，2，3*，庞青涛4，朱建国1，2，范志刚4，刘敬樟1. 35 t/h 纯燃超低挥发分碳基燃料预热燃烧锅炉运行特性研究[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 50-56.

OUYANG Ziqu1，2，MAN Chengbo1，LI Zenglin4，LI Shiyuan1，2，3*，PANG Qingtao4，ZHU Jianguo1，2，FAN Zhigang4，LIU Jingzhang1. Study on operation characteristics of a 35 t/h preheating combustion boiler with pure ultra-low volatile carbon-based fuels[J]. Huadian Technology, 2020, 42(7): 50-56.

[1]	闫新春, 曹欢, 华云鹏. 基于人工智能的锅炉受热面管壁温度预测[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(3): 58-62.
[2]	丛星亮, 谢红, 苏阳, 张骏, 程英捷. 660 MW超超临界二次再热机组深度调峰试验研究[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(5): 64-69.
[3]	刘义斌, 刘旋坤, 宋刚, 杨欣华, 张缦, 杨海瑞. 350 MW超临界煤粉锅炉全燃准东煤的运行优化研究[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(12): 79-84.
[4]	陈全喜, 付江涛. 市政污泥耦合燃煤电厂发电关键因素分析与展望[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(10): 50-60.
[5]	谭雪梅, 刘世杰, 赵冰, 巩太义, 王家林, 胡南. 循环流化床锅炉气固两相流换热研究进展[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(10): 61-67.
[6]	刘秀如, 李佩佩, 王先鹏, 芦旭阁, 王志强. 锅炉烟气酸露点研究现状及展望[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(9): 45-55.
[7]	闫永宏, 陈登科, 孙刘涛, 彭政康, 孙锐. 粒径对热解半焦和烟煤掺混燃烧特性的影响和试验研究[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 1-10.
[8]	毛崎森, 王长安, 冯芹芹, 赵林, 袁茂博, 刘成昌, 车得福. 灰化方式对煤基固体混合燃料灰分理化特性的影响[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 11-19.
[9]	孙刘涛, 闫永宏, 陈登科, 彭政康, 孙锐. 燃烧器钝体扩展角度对半焦/烟煤混燃及NOx排放的影响[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 20-27.
[10]	戴若薇, 赵瑞东, 秦建光, 陈天举, 吴晋沪. 热解半焦与褐煤掺烧及气体污染物排放特性 TG-FTIR 研究[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 28-34.
[11]	郑少伟，王志强*，王鹏，程星星，许焕焕. 热解半焦的清洁高效利用现状及研究进展[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 42-49.
[12]	李瑶1，2，3，徐婕1，2，王奕晨1，2，陈刚1，2，杨小彦1，2，卫鹏程1，2，李恒1，2，王莹燕4. 半焦成型技术用于民用燃料的可行性分析[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 57-62.
[13]	郑洪岩, 贾丁丁, 赵言, 冯智皓, 白宗庆. 气化残炭与低阶煤混燃特性及动力学分析[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(7): 74-80.
[14]	王志永，许贺，朱慧敏，葛俊沛，许静. 燃气-蒸汽联合循环机组余热锅炉热效率计算模型对比分析[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(6): 47-51.
[15]	吴思明，童家麟，吴跃森，齐勇，孙五一 . 某亚临界锅炉综合升级改造实践及其性能分析[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(6): 66-71.