基于灰色群组聚类和CRITIC组合赋权的线路管廊入廊费用定价研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2023.11.010

综合智慧能源 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 82-89.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2023.11.010

• 电力经济与市场交易 • 上一篇

基于灰色群组聚类和CRITIC组合赋权的线路管廊入廊费用定价研究

徐晓军¹(), 李奎¹, 张方银¹, 周阳¹, 叶飞²^,^*(), 关前锋², 米乐乐²

1.贵州电网规划研究中心，贵阳 550001
2.中国能源建设集团广东省电力设计院，广州 510535

收稿日期:2022-12-16 修回日期:2023-03-15 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-12-06
通讯作者: * 叶飞（1987），男，高级工程师，硕士，从事电力工程造价及工程咨询等方面的工作，yefei@gedi.com.cn。
作者简介:徐晓军（1979），男（仡佬族），高级工程师，从事电网技术经济研究分析、造价控制与管理、计价标准等方面的研究，xuxiaojun@163.com。

Research on the pricing mechanism of pipelines' utility tunnel entering cost based on grey group clustering and CRITIC combined weighting

XU Xiaojun¹(), LI Kui¹, ZHANG Fangyin¹, ZHOU Yang¹, YE Fei²^,^*(), GUAN Qianfeng², MI Lele²

1. Guizhou Power Grid Planning and Research Center，Guiyang 550001，China
2. China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute，Guangzhou 510535，China

Received:2022-12-16 Revised:2023-03-15 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

电力管线入地敷设在城市电网建设和改造中得到大规模推广，合理的线路管廊入廊费用定价机制对促进线路管廊的建设与发展具有重要意义。现有收费机制在计算分摊系数时存在缺陷，鉴于此，提出了一种基于灰色群组聚类和客观赋权法（CRITIC）组合赋权的费用分摊模型。基于受益方付费原则确定入廊各方的费用分摊指标，分别采用灰色群组聚类和CRITIC计算各分摊指标的主观权重系数和客观权重系数，综合考虑指标权重的主客观信息，基于离差平方和方法计算各分摊指标的组合权重。将该模型应用于某线路管廊入廊费用分摊案例，验证了所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 电力管线, 管廊入廊定价机制, 组合赋权, 灰色群组聚类, 客观赋权法

Abstract:

Underground laying method is recommended in municipal grid construction and upgrading， and reasonable pricing mechanism for the pipelines' utility tunnel entering cost is significant to the utility tunnel construction. The existing charging mechanism is flawed in allocation coefficients' calculation. Thus， a cost allocation model based on grey group clustering and CRITIC combined weighting is proposed. First of all， the cost-sharing indicators of all parties entering the tunnel are determined based on the principle of beneficiary payment. Then， the subjective weight coefficients and objective weight coefficients of different apportionment indexes are calculated based on grey group clustering and CRITIC， respectively. Finally， considering the subjective and objective weighting data， the combined weight of each apportionment index is calculated based on the sum of squares of deviations. The proposed model is applied to a pipelines' utility tunnel entering cost allocation scheme， and the case study verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: electric pipeline, pricing mechanism of utility tunnel entering cost, combined weighting, grey group clustering, CRTIC

中图分类号:

TM757:TU91

徐晓军, 李奎, 张方银, 周阳, 叶飞, 关前锋, 米乐乐. 基于灰色群组聚类和CRITIC组合赋权的线路管廊入廊费用定价研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2023, 45(11): 82-89.

XU Xiaojun, LI Kui, ZHANG Fangyin, ZHOU Yang, YE Fei, GUAN Qianfeng, MI Lele. Research on the pricing mechanism of pipelines' utility tunnel entering cost based on grey group clustering and CRITIC combined weighting[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2023, 45(11): 82-89.

图/表 5

图1

表1

各管线指标

指标	Y1	Y2	Y3	Y4	Y5	Y6
$S 1$ /万元	1 316.70	1 007.30	2 060.30	2 010.00	1 136.38	3 369.80
$S 2$ /%	9.5	7.9	26.6	19.1	25.0	11.9
$S 3$ /万元	3.14	2.50	6.62	5.46	5.15	6.23

表1

图2

表2

图3

参考文献 19

[1]	王恒栋. 我国城市地下综合管廊工程建设中的若干问题[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(5):523-528.
	WANG Hengdong. Several problems about urban underground utility tunnel during construction in China[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(5):523-528.
[2]	刘中正. 城市地下综合管廊工程建设思考[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2022, 12(34):103-106.
	LIU Zhongzheng. Thinking about the construction of urban underground integrated pipeline corridor project[J]. Technology Innovation and Application, 2022, 12(34):103-106.
[3]	张子钰. 城市地下综合管廊定价模型及实证研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(2):299-305.
	ZHANG Ziyu. A pricing model of city underground pipe gallery and its practise[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(2):299-305.
[4]	孙纪康, 张智超, 王美娜, 等. 关于综合管廊有偿使用收费测算方法及存在问题的讨论[J]. 市政技术, 2020, 38(4):281-284.
	SUN Jikang, ZHANG Zhichao, WANG Meina, et al. Calculation method and existing problems of the utility tunnel collection[J]. Municipal Engineering Technology, 2020, 38(4):281-284.
[5]	乔柱, 刘伊生, 张宏, 等. 综合管廊有偿使用的收费定价研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(2):306-314.
	QIAO Zhu, LIU Yisheng, ZHANG Hong, et al. Charge pricing research on paid-use of comprehensive utility tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(2):306-314.
[6]	姬永红, 殷仕睿, 张琪, 等. 综合管廊有偿使用收费方式及其适用性探究[J]. 城市道桥与防洪, 2020(11):143-148.
	JI Yonghong, YIN Shirui, ZHANG Qi, et al. Exploration on charging method and its applicability for compensated use of utility tunnel[J]. Urban Roads,Bridges & Flood Control, 2020(11):143-148.
[7]	LI L, GUO X, LI D, et al. Cost allocation model of power pipeline access corridor based on group decision and spatial proportion method[C]// Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2020, 1650(3): 032031.
[8]	赵亚娟, 郁春松. 基于改进两部制的综合管廊PPP项目定价研究[J]. 安徽建筑大学学报, 2020, 28(4):57-64.
	ZHAO Yajuan, YU Chunsong. Pricing research on PPP project of utility tunnel based on improved two part tariff[J]. Journal of Anhui Jianzhu University, 2020, 28(4):57-64.
[9]	王如钰. 城市地下综合管廊收费定价模型研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020.
	WANG Ruyu. Research on the pricing model of urban underground utility tunnel[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020.
[10]	付雅姝. 基于三方满意的综合管廊PPP项目入廊定价机制研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2019.
	FU Yashu. Research on the pricing mechanism of utility tunnel under PPP model based on three-party satisfaction[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2019.
[11]	董爱. 城市综合管廊PPP项目政府补贴测算模型研究[D]. 北京: 北京建筑大学, 2020.
	DONG Ai. Research on government subsidy measurement model of urban integrated pipe corridor PPP project[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2020.
[12]	王柏峰. 地下综合管廊PPP项目定价和调价机制研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2018.
	WANG Baifeng. Study on pricing and price adjustment mechanism of urban utility tunnel use PPP mode[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2018.
[13]	FANG J, WANG B F, ZHANG Y, et al. Study on the price forming mechanism of the urban utility tunnel using PPP mode[J]. DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, 2017:18336.
[14]	许晶伟. 综合管廊PPP项目核心利益相关者利益协调研究[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2021.
	XU Jingwei. Study on the coordination of core stakeholders' interests in integrated pipe corridor PPP projects[D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Science & Technology, 2021.
[15]	周漩, 张凤鸣, 惠晓滨, 等. 基于信息熵的专家聚类赋权方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2011, 26(1):153-156.
	ZHOU Xuan, ZHANG Fengming, HUI Xiaobin, et al. Method for determining experts' weights based on entropy and cluster analysis[J]. Control and Decision, 2011, 26(1):153-156.
[16]	DELGADO A, ROMERO I. Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: A case study of a mining project in Peru[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 77: 108-121.
[17]	陈甜甜, 高亚静, 卢占会. 基于双尺度度量的改进模糊均值曲线聚类方法研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(4): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.04.001
	CHEN Tiantian, GAO Yajing, LU Zhanhui. Research on improved fuzzy mean curve clustering method based on two-scale measurement[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(4): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.04.001
[18]	SAATY T L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process[J]. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1(1): 83-98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
[19]	DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22(7): 763-770. doi: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H

项目	Y1	Y2	Y3	Y4	Y5	Y6	合计
分摊因子	0.108 7	0.086 2	0.225 0	0.187 5	0.172 3	0.220 3	1.000 0
一次性入廊费用/万元	881.35	698.92	1 824.32	1 520.27	1 397.03	1 786.21	8 108.10
年度日常维护费用/万元	3.16	2.51	6.55	5.46	5.01	6.41	29.11

基于灰色群组聚类和CRITIC组合赋权的线路管廊入廊费用定价研究

Research on the pricing mechanism of pipelines' utility tunnel entering cost based on grey group clustering and CRITIC combined weighting

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 19

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	申融容, 姜丰, 韦泽全, 刘世民, 祁泽. 基于博弈论组合赋权和MARCOS的能源互联网园区项目综合效益评价[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2023, 45(11): 70-81.
[2]	温晓强. 区域电网电力平衡度评价模型与方法[J]. 华电技术, 2017, 39(7): 24-27.