华电技术 ›› 2013, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 14-17.

• 研究与开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

非能动系统可靠性分析方法比较

陈娟,周涛,刘亮,王泽雷   

  1. 华北电力大学核热工安全与标准化研究所,北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2013-02-25 发布日期:2013-02-25

Comparison of reliability analysis methods for passive systems

CHEN Juan, ZHOU Tao, LIU Liang, WANG Zelei   

  1. Institute of Nuclear Thermal Safety and Standardization,North China Electric Power University,Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2013-02-25 Published:2013-02-25

摘要: 针对核电站非能动系统硬件失效较少、物理过程失效较多的特点,基于非能动系统的定义和主要特性,对其可靠性进行了分析。以非能动余热排出系统和安全壳冷却系统为例,通过对不同非能动系统可靠性分析方法的比较,指出了各种方法的特点和适用情况。由于实际运行数据缺乏,数学方法的引入对非能动可靠性分析具有重要价值。

关键词: 核电站, 非能动系统, 可靠性分析, 建模方法, 比较

Abstract: Aiming at the fault feature of the nuclear power station, which is that there the hardware failure of the passive system is infrequent and the failure of the physical process occurs more often, based on the definition of the passive system and its main features, the reliability of the passive system was analyzed. Taking the passive residual heat removal system and the containment vessel cooling system as examples, the reliability analysis methods for different passive systems were compared, and the features and the applicability of each method were pointed out. Due to the lack of practical operation data, introduction of the mathematic method is of important significance for reliability analysis of passive system.

Key words: nuclear power station, passive system, reliability analysis, modeling method, comparison