质子交换膜电解水制氢影响因素的过程模拟

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.05.010

综合智慧能源 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 88-94.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.05.010

• 优化运行 • 上一篇

质子交换膜电解水制氢影响因素的过程模拟

张立栋¹^,²(), 陈怡冰¹, 龚明³^,^*(), 赵桦粮³, 王欣³, 黄宏艳³

1.东北电力大学能源与动力工程学院,吉林吉林 132012
2.东北电力大学油页岩综合利用教育部工程研心,吉林吉林 132012
3.北京合工仿真技术有限公司,北京 100192

收稿日期:2022-04-21 修回日期:2022-05-06 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-06-09
通讯作者: 龚明
作者简介:张立栋（1980）,男,副教授,博士,从事新能源科学与工程等方面的研究, nedu1015@aliyun.com。
基金资助:
教育部“创新团队发展计划”项目(IRT_17R19)

Process simulation of factors affecting proton exchange membrane water electrolysis for hydrogen production

Lidong ZHANG¹^,²(), Yibing CHEN¹, Ming GONG³^,^*(), Hualiang ZHAO³, Xin WANG³, Hongyan HUANG³

1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China
2. Engineering Research Center of Oil Shale Comprehensive Utilization Ministry of Education, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China
3. Beijing Hegong Simulation Technology Company Limited, Beijing 100192, China

Received:2022-04-21 Revised:2022-05-06 Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-06-09
Contact: Ming GONG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氢能领域相关技术的快速发展有助于我国实现“双碳”目标。基于联立方程建模技术,对质子交换膜（PEM）制氢进行过程模拟,研究了在不同温度、操作压力、质子膜厚度等影响因素下,制氢系统电压、功率及效率随电流密度变化的规律。研究结果表明：在满足制氢安全约束下时,阴极操作压力为0.728 MPa并选择厚度为27.5 μm的质子膜时,制氢系统具有最高的效率,达69.3%。

关键词: 碳中和, 氢能, 过程模拟, 质子交换膜, 电解水制氢, 综合能源

Abstract:

Progresses in hydrogen industry contributes to the goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality in China. Simultaneous equation modeling technique can be used to simulate the hydrogen production process by Proton Exchange Membrane（PEM）. The variation of voltage, power and efficiency of the hydrogen production system with current density under different temperature, operating pressure and proton membrane thickness was studied. The model is optimized by iterative optimization. The results show that the highest working efficiency of the hydrogen production system under hydrogen safety constraints is 69.3 % with a cathode operating pressure at 0.728 MPa and a PEM thickness of 27.5 μm.

Key words: carbon neutrality, hydrogen energy, process simulation, proton exchange membrane（PEM）, water electrolysis for produce hydrogen, integrated energy

中图分类号:

TK91：TQ116

张立栋, 陈怡冰, 龚明, 赵桦粮, 王欣, 黄宏艳. 质子交换膜电解水制氢影响因素的过程模拟[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(5): 88-94.

Lidong ZHANG, Yibing CHEN, Ming GONG, Hualiang ZHAO, Xin WANG, Hongyan HUANG. Process simulation of factors affecting proton exchange membrane water electrolysis for hydrogen production[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(5): 88-94.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 18

[1]	金红光, 宣益民, 何雅玲, 等. 工程热物理学科与能源可持续发展[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2020, 50(10):1245-1251.
	JIN Hongguang, XUAN Yimin, HE Yaling, et al. Engineering thermophysics and sustainable energy development[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2020, 50(10): 1245-1251. doi: 10.1360/SST-2020-0114
[2]	喻小宝, 郑丹丹, 杨康, 等. “双碳”目标下能源电力行业的机遇与挑战[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(6): 21-32.
	YU Xiaobao, ZHENG Dandan, YANG Kang, et al. Opportunities and challenges faced by energy and power industry with the goal of carbon neutrality and carbon peak[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(6): 21-32.
[3]	马双忱, 杨鹏威, 王放放, 等. “双碳”目标下传统火电面临的挑战与对策[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(12):36-45.
	MA Shuangchen, YANG Pengwei, WANG Fangfang, et al. Challenges and countermeasures of traditional thermal power under the goals of carbon neutrality and carbon peaking[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(12): 36-45.
[4]	金辉, 樊超, 葛志伟, 等. 阻力比拟分析在煤炭超临界水气化制氢研究中的应用[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2022, 42(1):1-9.
	JIN Hui, FAN Chao, GE Zhiwei, et al. Resistance analogy analyze for coal gasification in supercritical water for hydrogen production[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2022, 42(1):1-9.
[5]	王义军, 陈美霖, 牟雪峰, 等. 考虑储能及多负荷需求响应的微电网优化运行[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2021, 41(2):108-118.
	WANG Yijun, CHEN Meilin, MOU Xuefeng, et al. Operation of microgrid considering energy storage and response of power and thermal loads[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2021, 41(2): 108-118.
[6]	王晓海, 徐静静, 胡永锋, 等. 新形势下发电企业在综合能源服务领域的业务分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(3):9-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.03.002
	WANG Xiaohai, XU Jingjing, HU Yongfeng, et al. Business analysis on integrated energy services of power generation enterprises under the new circumstances[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(3): 9-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.03.002
[7]	徐明, 邵明飞, 刘清雅, 等. 电解水制氢耦合碳酸盐还原展望[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1121-1124.
	XU Ming, SHAO Mingfei, LIU Qingya, et al. Hydrogen generation from electrochemical water splitting coupling carbonate reduction[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1121-1124.
[8]	苏秀丽, 廖文俊, 李严. 分步法电解水制氢的机遇与挑战[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(1):87-95.
	SU Xiuli, LIAO Wenjun, LI Yan. Opportunities and challenges of hydrogen production with decoupled water electrolysis[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2021, 10(1):87-95.
[9]	王培灿, 万磊, 徐子昂, 等. 碱性膜电解水制氢技术现状与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(12): 6161-6175.
	WANG Peican, WAN Lei, XU Ziang, et al. Hydrogen production based on anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: A critical review and perspective[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(12): 6161-6175.
[10]	王国聪, 徐则林, 多志丽, 等. 混合制冷剂氢气液化工艺优化[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2021, 41(6):61-70.
	WANG Guocong, XU Zelin, DUO Zhili, et al. Optimization of mixed refrigerant hydrogen liquefaction process[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2021, 41(6):61-70.
[11]	胡兵, 徐立军, 何山, 等. 碳达峰与碳中和目标下 PEM 电解水制氢研究进展[J/OL]. 化工进展:1-15[2022-05-06].DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2464. doi: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2464
	HU Bing, XU Lijun, HE Shan, et al. Researching progress of hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis under the goal of carbon emission peaking and carbon neutrality[J/OL]:1-15[2022-05-06].Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2464. doi: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2464
[12]	万年坊. 质子交换膜水电解制氢膜电极研究进展[J/OL]. 化工进展:1-12[2022-05-06].DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0383. doi: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0383
	WAN Nianfang. Research progress of membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis for hydrogen production[J/OL]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress:1-12[2022-05-06].DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0383. doi: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0383
[13]	郑金松, 莫景科. PEM水电解池反应特性参数的三维模型数值模拟[J]. 电源技术, 2021, 45(11):1401-1404,1504.
	ZHENG Jinsong, MO Jingke. Three-dimensional modeling of the reaction characteristic parameters of PEM electrolysis cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 45(11): 1401-1404,1504.
[14]	高立兵, 吕中原, 索寒生, 等. 石油化工流程模拟软件现状与发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 1-14.
	GAO Libing, LYU Zhongyuan, SUO Hansheng,et.al. Market analysis and development trend of petrochemical process simulation software[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(S2): 1-14.
[15]	吴国策, 朱兴仪, 赵英汝. 一种新型的太阳能驱动ORC-HP热电联产耦合系统[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(S1):195-202.
	WU Guoce, ZHU Xingyi, ZHAO Yingru. A new type of solar-driven ORC-HP combined heat and power coupling system[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(S1): 195-202.
[16]	秦宇枭, 刘培, 李政. 光热电厂储热系统动态建模及仿真[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2021, 42(12):3125-3132.
	QIN Yuxiao, LIU Pei, LI Zheng. Dynamic modeling and simulation of the thermal storage system in solar thermal power plant[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2021, 42(12): 3125-3132.
[17]	陈耀明, 许锋, 罗雄麟. 基于相对增益和优先级的化工过程协调优化裕量设计[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1280-1290.
	CHEN Yaoming, XU Feng, LUO Xionglin. A coordinated optimal margin design method for chemical process based on relative gain and priority[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(3): 1280-1290.
[18]	LISO V, SAVOIA G, ARAYA S S, et al. Modelling and experimental analysis of a polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis cell at different operating temperatures[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(12):3273. doi: 10.3390/en11123273

质子交换膜电解水制氢影响因素的过程模拟

Process simulation of factors affecting proton exchange membrane water electrolysis for hydrogen production

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	钟鹏元, 杨晓宏, 寇建玉. 含储氢结构的园区综合能源系统优化配置研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 11-19.
[2]	韩世旺, 赵颖, 张兴宇, 玄承博, 赵田田, 侯绪凯, 刘倩倩. 面向碳中和的新型电力系统氢储能调峰技术研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 20-26.
[3]	江婷, 赵雅姣. 基于燃气分布式的综合能源系统碳减排分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 27-32.
[4]	张旭, 张浩浩, 顾吉浩. 室温空间特性差异性分析及抽样推断方法研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 51-58.
[5]	姜曙, 刘芳芳, 刘媛媛, 陈启召, 连丽, 任梦楠. “地热能+”在工程实践中的综合梯级应用[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 59-64.
[6]	余果, 吴军, 夏热, 陈逸珲, 郭子辉, 黄文鑫. 构网型变流器技术的发展现状与趋势研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 65-70.
[7]	唐琦雯, 沈琪, 祝俊, 苏宜靖. 浙江调频辅助服务市场机制设计及运营实践[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 71-77.
[8]	罗丽琦, 王月, 钟海军, 李庆勋, 谢广元, 王绍荣. 固体氧化物燃料电池热电联供系统设计[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(8): 25-32.
[9]	杨莹, 张雁祥, 闫牧夫. 中低温固体氧化物燃料电池电解质制备方法研究进展[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(8): 50-57.
[10]	曹加锋, 李欣然, 邵善德, 冀月霞, 邵宗平. 质子陶瓷燃料电池稳定性研究综述[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(8): 58-67.
[11]	许阳森, 张磊, 毕磊. 中温质子导体固体氧化物燃料电池的发展与挑战[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(8): 68-74.
[12]	陈晗钰, 周晓亮, 刘立敏, 钱欣源, 王宙, 何非凡, 绳阳. 质子导体固体电解池电解水制氢研究进展[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(8): 75-85.
[13]	胡翀, 赵袁, 陈代芬. 基于单层电堆形式的质子交换膜燃料电池仿真模拟研究及优化[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(8): 91-96.
[14]	李惠军, 陆建强, 周霞, 解相朋, 万磊. 面向智慧园区系统的网络攻击关联分析与防护策略研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(7): 1-9.
[15]	李华, 郑洪纬, 周博文, 李广地, 杨波. 综合智慧能源系统中抽水蓄能电站两部制电价研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(7): 10-18.