基于风光上网量的抽汽-熔盐储热光煤耦合调峰系统运行策略经济性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2026.05.009

综合智慧能源 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 83-94.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2026.05.009

• 综合能源系统分析与评估 • 上一篇

基于风光上网量的抽汽-熔盐储热光煤耦合调峰系统运行策略经济性分析

崔雅茹^a^,^b(), 鹿院卫^a^,^b^,^*(), 王子瑄^a^,^b(), 杨涵^a^,^b(), 吴玉庭^a^,^b()

北京工业大学 a.传热与能源利用北京市重点实验室；b.国家能源用户侧储能创新研发中心，北京 100124

收稿日期:2026-01-09 修回日期:2026-02-26 出版日期:2026-04-14
通讯作者: *鹿院卫（1971），女，教授，博士，从事可再生能源利用方面的研究，luyuanwei@bjut.edu.cn。
作者简介:崔雅茹（2001），女，硕士生，从事熔盐储热提高火电厂灵活性方面的研究，cuiyaru@emails.bjut.edu.cn；
王子瑄（2001），男，硕士生，从事混合熔盐热物性计算、螺旋缠绕管换热器多目标优化设计等方面的研究，zixuanwang@emails.bjut.edu.cn；
杨涵（1991），女，讲师，博士，从事可再生能源利用方面的研究，yanghan@bjut.edu.cn；
吴玉庭（1970），男，研究员，博士，从事可再生能源利用方面的研究，wuyuting@bjut.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFB4202402)

Economic efficiency analysis of operation strategies for the solar-coal peak-shaving system with steam extraction and molten salt thermal energy storage based on wind and solar power integration amount

CUI Yaru^a^,^b(), LU Yuanwei^a^,^b^,^*(), WANG Zixuan^a^,^b(), YANG Han^a^,^b(), WU Yuting^a^,^b()

a.Beijing Key Laboratory of Heat Transfer and Energy Conversion；b.National User-Side Energy Storage Innovation Research and Development Center，Beijing University of Technology， Beijing 100124， China

Received:2026-01-09 Revised:2026-02-26 Published:2026-04-14
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2022YFB4202402)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决高比例风光并网背景下燃煤机组调峰灵活性与经济性的协同难题，以600 MW亚临界燃煤机组为研究载体，提出基于抽汽-熔盐储热的光煤耦合深度调峰系统。针对现有研究未充分考虑风光上网量与调峰系统运行策略相互影响的局限，构建了包含初始投资、运行维护及燃煤成本的全生命周期成本体系，并以净现值、动态投资回收期、平准化度电成本及风光弃电量为评价指标的经济模型。结合风光出力曲线与日负荷曲线，设计7种差异化运行策略，通过熵权-优劣解距离法实现多维度性能的综合优选。研究结果表明：策略1为综合性能最优方案，凭借精准匹配风光高出力-负荷低谷的储热时序，实现净现值1.807 1×10⁹元、动态投资回收期7.424 a及风光弃电量2 090 MW·h的三重优势，其系统输出功率与日负荷曲线呈良好跟随性，风光消纳比例为72.54%。

关键词: 熔盐储热, 光煤耦合, 深度调峰, 风光消纳, 运行策略, 熵权-优劣解距离法, 经济性

Abstract:

To solve the problem of coordinating peak-shaving flexibility and economic efficiency of coal-fired units under the background of high-proportion wind-solar power integration， 600 MW subcritical coal-fired units were taken as the research object， and a deep peak-shaving system with solar-coal coupling based on steam extraction and molten salt thermal energy storage was proposed. In view of the limitation that existing research fails to fully consider the interaction between wind and solar power integration amount and the operation strategies for the peak-shaving system， a life-cycle cost system covering initial investment， operation and maintenance， and coal cost was established. Additionally， an economic model was established with net present value， dynamic investment payback period， levelized cost of electricity， and wind and solar power curtailment as evaluation indicators. Combined with wind and solar output curves and daily load curves， seven differentiated operation strategies were designed， and their multi-dimensional performance was comprehensively optimized and selected using the entropy weight-TOPSIS method. The results showed that strategy 1 was optimal for comprehensive performance. By precisely matching the thermal energy storage timing of high wind and solar power output with low load periods， strategy 1 achieved the triple advantages of a net present value of 1.807 1×10⁹ yuan， a dynamic investment payback period of 7.424 a， and wind and solar power curtailment of 2 090 MW·h. The system output power closely followed the daily load curves， and the wind and solar power integration ratio reached 72.54%.

Key words: molten salt thermal energy storage, solar-coal coupling, deep peak shaving, wind and solar power integration, operation strategies, entropy weight-TOPSIS method, economic efficiency

中图分类号:

TK01

崔雅茹, 鹿院卫, 王子瑄, 杨涵, 吴玉庭. 基于风光上网量的抽汽-熔盐储热光煤耦合调峰系统运行策略经济性分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2026, 48(5): 83-94.

CUI Yaru, LU Yuanwei, WANG Zixuan, YANG Han, WU Yuting. Economic efficiency analysis of operation strategies for the solar-coal peak-shaving system with steam extraction and molten salt thermal energy storage based on wind and solar power integration amount[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2026, 48(5): 83-94.

图/表 17

表1

表2

图1

表3

图2

图3

表4

表5

调峰系统运行策略

运行策略时间	策略1	策略2	策略3	策略4	策略5	策略6	策略7
00:00	50%THA	释热	释热	释热	释热	75%THA	75%THA
01:00	50%THA	释热	释热	50%THA	75%THA	75%THA	50%THA
02:00	50%THA	释热	75%THA	释热	75%THA	75%THA	75%THA
03:00	75%THA	75%THA	75%THA	释热	75%THA	75%THA	75%THA
04:00	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热
05:00	75%THA	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热
06:00	50%THA	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热
07:00	释热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热
08:00	75%THA	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热
09:00	75%THA	抽汽储热+光热储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	抽汽储热	释热	释热
10:00	75%THA	抽汽储热+光热储热	释热	50%THA+光热储热	释热	释热	释热
11:00	75%THA+光热储热	75%THA+光热储热	释热	释热	释热	75%THA+光热储热	75%THA
12:00	75%THA+光热储热	释热	75%THA+光热储热	释热	75%THA+光热储热	75%THA+光热储热	50%THA+光热储热
13:00	50%THA	释热	75%THA+光热储热	75%THA+光热储热	75%THA+光热储热	50%THA+光热储热	50%THA+光热储热
14:00	50%THA	75%THA+光热储热	75%THA+光热储热	50%THA+光热储热	75%THA+光热储热	50%THA	50%THA+光热储热
15:00	75%THA	75%THA+光热储热	50%THA+光热储热	50%THA+光热储热	50%THA+光热储热	50%THA	50%THA
16:00	75%THA	释热	50%THA	50%THA	50%THA	50%THA	50%THA
17:00	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热
18:00	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热
19:00	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热
20:00	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热
21:00	50%THA	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热	释热
22:00	抽汽储热	释热	释热	50%THA	释热	75%THA	50%THA
23:00	抽汽储热	释热	50%THA	50%THA	释热	50%THA	50%THA

表5

表6

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表7

图10

参考文献 28

[1]	刘明旭, 牟辰泽, 郭明, 等. 考虑含熔盐火储联合机组的虚拟电厂优化调度[J]. 中外能源, 2025, 30(10): 22-32.
	LIU Mingxu, MOU Chenze, GUO Ming, et al. Optimal dispatching of virtual power plants with molten salt energy storage-CHP units[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2025, 30(10): 22-32.
[2]	孙珂. 清洁能源消纳利用情况良好可再生能源电量占特高压直流输送电量的52.5%[N]. 国家电网报, 2024-11-12: (5).
[3]	谭甲群, 吕如轩, 鞠洪晋, 等. 基于改进秃鹰搜索算法的风光火储综合能源系统优化调度策略研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47(8): 68-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2025.08.008
	TAN Jiaqun, LYU Ruxuan, JU Hongjin, et al. Research on optimal scheduling strategy of wind-photovoltaic-thermal-storage integrated energy system based on IBES[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2025, 47(8): 68-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2025.08.008
[4]	卢勇振. 新形势下煤电机组灵活性改造技术研究[J]. 锅炉技术, 2022, 53(6): 72-76, 80.
	LU Yongzhen. Research on the flexibility modification technology of coal power units under the new situation[J]. Boiler Technology, 2022, 53(6): 72-76, 80.
[5]	杨灿, 胡丽娜, 魏俊, 等. 燃煤机组耦合熔盐储热系统的性能分析及经济性评价[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(12): 4795-4809.
	YANG Can, HU Lina, WEI Jun, et al. Performance comparison and economic evaluation of coal-fired units coupled with molten salt thermal energy storage systems[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(12): 4795-4809.
[6]	吕翀, 王斌, 蒋国安, 等. 燃煤电厂耦合熔盐与固体颗粒储热系统热力性能与经济性对比研究[J]. 锅炉技术, 2025, 56(6): 50-59.
	LYU Chong, WANG Bin, JIANG Guoan, et al. Comparative study of thermal performance and economy of coupled molten salt and solid particle heat storage systems for coal-fired power plants[J]. Boiler Technology, 2025, 56(6): 50-59.
[7]	王斌, 刘金恺, 姜晓霞, 等. 基于经济性分析的熔盐储热辅助燃煤机组灵活调峰系统优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(7): 2729-2737. doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0304
	WANG Bin, LIU Jinkai, JIANG Xiaoxia, et al. Optimization of flexibile peak shaving system of coal-fired unit aided by molten salt heat storage based on economic analysis[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(7): 2729-2737. doi: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0304
[8]	HAN X, SUN C Q, HE P L, et al. Investigation into the thermodynamic properties of three coupling schemes involving CAES, MSHS, and CFPP systems[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 97: 112771. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.112771
[9]	LIU M, MIAO L, WANG Z, et al. Design and thermo-economic analysis on molten salt thermal energy storage system integrated within coal-fired power plant: Co-storing energy from live and reheat steam[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 131: 117637. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.117637
[10]	ZHANG Q J, DONG J N, CHEN H, et al. Dynamic characteristics and economic analysis of a coal-fired power plant integrated with molten salt thermal energy storage for improving peaking capacity[J]. Energy, 2024, 290: 130132. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.130132
[11]	赵大周, 谢玉荣, 张钟平, 等. 300 MW燃煤供热机组熔盐储热系统设计及经济性分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46(9): 45-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2024.09.006
	ZHAO Dazhou, XIE Yurong, ZHANG Zhongping, et al. Design and economic analysis of the molten salt heat storage system for a 300 MW coal-fired heating unit[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2024, 46(9): 45-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2024.09.006
[12]	洪春雪, 肖海平, 谭甲群, 等. 考虑容量电价的风光火储能源基地多目标优化调度[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47(7): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2025.07.001
	HONG Chunxue, XIAO Haiping, TAN Jiaqun, et al. Multi-objective optimal schedule of a wind-photovoltaic-thermal-storage energy base considering capacity tariffs[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2025, 47(7): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2025.07.001
[13]	杨腾飞, 侯宏娟, 刘鹏, 等. 集成熔融盐储热的光煤互补发电系统变负荷灵活性研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025, 46(10): 351-359.
	YANG Tengfei, HOU Hongjuan, LIU Peng, et al. Research on flexibility in load variations of solar hybrid coal power generation system with molten salt thermal storage[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2025, 46(10): 351-359.
[14]	严卉, 刘明, 种道彤, 等. 光煤互补发电系统变工况能势匹配分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2023, 44(11): 2981-2990.
	YAN Hui, LIU Ming, CHONG Daotong, et al. Energy potential matching analysis of solar-aided coal-fired power plant under off-design conditions[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2023, 44(11): 2981-2990.
[15]	崔庆伟, 付文锋. 光煤互补电站热力系统集成方案㶲分析[J]. 能源工程, 2025, 45(5): 66-71.
	CUI Qingwei, FU Wenfeng. Exergetic analysis of thermodynamic system integration for solar-coal-fired power plants[J]. Energy Engineering, 2025, 45(5): 66-71.
[16]	肖艳红, 郭田, 余廷芳. 两种运行模式下光煤互补发电系统热性能对比分析两种运行模式下光煤互补发电系统热性能对比分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(5): 121-127. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-0031
	XIAO Yanhong, GUO Tian, YU Tingfang. Thermal performance analysis of solar-aided coa-fired power generation system under two typical operation modes[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44(5): 121-127. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-0031
[17]	魏海姣. 基于储热的燃煤机组深度调峰系统构建及其规模化消纳风力发电模式研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2022.
	WEI Haijiao. Research on deep peak shaving system establishment of coal-fired power unit integrated with thermal energy storage and its application mode for large-scale wind power consumption[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2022.
[18]	LIU Q, SHANG L L, DUAN Y Y. Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal-fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 162: 149-162. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.078
[19]	MIAO L, LIU M, ZHANG K Z, et al. Energy, exergy, and economic analyses on coal-fired power plants integrated with the power-to-heat thermal energy storage system[J]. Energy, 2023, 284: 129236. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129236
[20]	ZHANG K Z, LIU M, ZHAO Y L, et al. Thermo-economic optimization of the thermal energy storage system extracting heat from the reheat steam for coal-fired power plants[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 215: 119008. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119008
[21]	陈建生. 太阳能-sCO₂循环发电系统集成及热-经济-环境分析与优化[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2021.
	CHEN Jiansheng. SPT-sCO₂ cycle power generation system thermal-economy-environment analysis and optimization[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2021.
[22]	AKBARI A D, MAHMOUDI S M S. Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO₂ (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle[J]. Energy, 2014, 78: 501-512. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.037
[23]	LI R, GUO S, YANG Y, et al. Optimal sizing of wind/concentrated solar plant/electric heater hybrid renewable energy system based on two-stage stochastic programming[J]. Energy, 2020, 209: 118472. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118472
[24]	张萍香. 企业项目投资决策净现值法研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 34(2): 252-258.
	ZHANG Pingxiang. Research on the net present value method of enterprise project investment decision[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Natural Science), 2020, 34(2): 252-258.
[25]	LIU M, ZHANG X W, MA Y G, et al. Thermo-economic analyses on a new conceptual system of waste heat recovery integrated with an S-CO₂ cycle for coal-fired power plants[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 161: 243-253. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.049
[26]	彭家辉, 倪永中, 王元良, 等. 基于熔盐储热的燃煤机组调峰可行性分析[J]. 热力发电, 2024, 53(1): 99-106.
	PENG Jiahui, NI Yongzhong, WANG Yuanliang, et al. Feasibility analysis of peak shaving for coal-fired units based on molten salt heat storage[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2024, 53(1): 99-106.
[27]	郝小霞. 基于AHP+熵权法的隧道围岩稳定性评价及支护方案优化[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2025(12):164-167,173.
	HAO Xiaoxia. Evaluation and supporting scheme optimization of tunnel surrounding rock stability based on AHP+entropy weight method[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2025(12): 164-167, 173.
[28]	罗先伟, 赵元元, 刘彦花, 等. 基于熵权-TOPSIS的硫化矿石自燃倾向性评价研究[J]. 有色金属(矿山部分), 2026, 78(1): 85-91.
	LUO Xianwei, ZHAO Yuanyuan, LIU Yanhua, et al. Evaluation on spontaneous combustion tendency of sulfide ores based on entropy weight-TOPSIS method[J]. Nonferrous Metals (Mining Section), 2026, 78(1): 85-91.

热力指标	工况
热力指标	100%THA	75%THA	50%THA
额定功率/MW	600.18	450.19	300.03
主蒸汽流量/（t·h^-1)	1 844.00	1 369.50	894.30
主蒸汽压力/MPa	16.67	14.40	9.77
主蒸汽温度/℃	538.00	538.00	538.00
再热蒸汽流量/（t·h^-1)	1 582.81	1 203.63	804.23
再热蒸汽压力/MPa	3.41	2.60	1.71
给水温度/℃	276.00	257.42	235.50

参数	100%THA			75%THA			50%THA
参数	设计值	模拟值	误差/%	设计值	模拟值	误差/%	设计值	模拟值	误差/%
发电功率/MW	600.18	600.33	0.02	450.21	450.73	0.12	300.03	299.74	0.10
主蒸汽流量/（t·h^-1)	1 848.78	1 844.00	0.26	1 350.31	1 369.50	1.42	900.11	894.30	0.65
主蒸汽压力/MPa	16.67	16.67	0.00	14.40	14.40	0.00	9.77	9.77	0.00
再热蒸汽流量/（t·h^-1)	1 576.13	1 582.81	0.42	1 173.44	1 203.63	2.57	789.27	804.23	1.90
再热蒸汽压力/MPa	3.41	3.41	0.00	2.56	2.60	1.39	1.75	1.71	2.10
^#1抽汽温度/℃	276.07	276.09	0.01	256.26	257.42	0.45	232.84	232.84	0.00
^#2抽汽温度/℃	245.44	245.44	0.00	228.95	230.02	0.47	208.45	208.44	0.00
^#3抽汽温度/℃	210.91	211.96	0.49	198.2	199.15	0.48	180.76	180.75	0.01
^#4抽汽温度/℃	178.34	178.33	0.01	166.68	167.47	0.47	151.9	151.88	0.01
^#5抽汽温度/℃	154.99	154.97	0.01	144.56	145.27	0.49	131.28	131.25	0.02
^#6抽汽温度/℃	121.66	121.62	0.03	113.05	113.65	0.53	102.07	102.00	0.07
^#7抽汽温度/℃	89.52	89.42	0.11	82.42	82.91	0.60	73.47	73.30	0.23

参数	设定值	参数	设定值
高温熔盐温度/℃	560.00	t_zp1/℃	538.00
中温熔盐温度/℃	328.00	t_zp2/℃	189.00
低温熔盐温度/℃	184.00	t_fp1/℃	175.97
主蒸汽抽汽量/（t·h^-1)	169.02	t_fp2/℃	263.76
光汽储热比	3	t_fp3/℃	322.50
储热基准工况	50%THA	t_fp4/℃	538.00
释热基准工况	75%THA	t_fp5/℃	538.00

时间	上网电价
00:00 — 04:00	0.205
04:00 —06:00	0.427
06:00 — 08:00	0.717
08:00 — 11:00	0.427
11:00 — 16:00	0.205
16:00 — 18:00	0.427
18:00 — 22:00	0.717
22:00 — 24:00	0.427

运行策略	净现值/10⁷元	动态投资回收期/a	平准化度电成本/[元·(kW·h)^-1]	风光弃电量/(MW·h)	得分
1	180.71	7.424	0.382	2 090	0.28
2	173.41	7.749	0.360	5 905	0.19
3	159.65	8.080	0.368	6 015	0.16
4	138.98	8.725	0.374	5 965	0.14
5	173.47	7.701	0.366	7 839	0.11
6	171.65	7.702	0.374	7 949	0.07
7	170.17	7.741	0.379	8 049	0.05
权重	0.138	0.138	0.257	0.468

基于风光上网量的抽汽-熔盐储热光煤耦合调峰系统运行策略经济性分析

Economic efficiency analysis of operation strategies for the solar-coal peak-shaving system with steam extraction and molten salt thermal energy storage based on wind and solar power integration amount

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

项目	运行策略
项目	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
风电消纳系数k₁	6	3	4	5	3	4	5
光伏发电消纳系数k₂	1	3	3	3	4	4	4

[1]	岳柏杨, 耿士敏, 程思远. 600 MW凝汽式机组熔盐储热系统设计及经济性分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2026, 48(5): 64-73.
[2]	张永剑, 李彬, 邢阁玉, 孙俊鹏, 徐钢, 薛小军. 基于熔盐储能的热电联产供汽扩容可行性研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2026, 48(5): 74-82.
[3]	黄帅, 向新宇, 李昂, 金旭, 阿如娜, 张家鹏. 跨临界CO₂热泵供暖系统循环优化与环境经济性评估[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2026, 48(4): 81-89.
[4]	洪春雪, 肖海平, 谭甲群, 吕如轩, 陈燕鹏, 巨星. 考虑容量电价的风光火储能源基地多目标优化调度[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47(7): 1-11.
[5]	蒋泽龄, 熊亚选, 白银雷, 耿博辰. 储热硝酸熔盐研究进展[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47(12): 14-24.
[6]	王芊瑞, 阮景昕, 王跃社. 考虑风、光出力时空相关性的电-氢协同储能系统经济性优化调度研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47(12): 34-45.
[7]	陈袁, 郭潇涵, 王廷鉴, 徐佩芸, 陈鹏, 王迪, 邓良胜. 基于磷酸燃料电池的三联供系统经济性测算及价格成本分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47(10): 26-33.
[8]	赵大周, 谢玉荣, 张钟平, 邓睿锋, 刘丽丽. 300 MW燃煤供热机组熔盐储热系统设计及经济性分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46(9): 45-52.
[9]	苑曙光, 张瑜婷, 王峰, 苑广震. 蒙西地区规模化储能商业运行模式及风险分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46(3): 63-71.
[10]	刘亨, 于洋, 李明航, 梁猛, 闫霆, 赵大周. 熔盐纳米流体比热容提升研究进展[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46(12): 45-54.
[11]	李博, 曹越, 徐景怡, 司风琪. 考虑火电-熔盐储热耦合特性的风光火储能源调度[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46(12): 55-63.
[12]	白章, 郝文杰, 李琦, 郝洪亮, 温彩凤, 郭苏, 黄贤坤. 基于全生命周期评价的风光制氢综合系统容量配置优化研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46(10): 1-11.
[13]	郁海彬, 高亦凌, 陆增洁, 董帅, 鲁林, 任逸之. 计及需求响应的风-火-储-碳捕集多源参与深度调峰市场的低碳经济调度[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2023, 45(8): 80-89.
[14]	王永林, 白永峰, 孔祥山, 郝正, 杨彭飞, 孔德伟. 基于CNN-LSTM算法的脱硝优化控制模型研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2023, 45(6): 25-33.
[15]	杜预则, 董海鹰. 基于主从博弈的储能电站协同源荷消纳新能源调控策略[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2023, 45(11): 1-9.