Modified active disturbance rejection control on the post-combustion CO2 capture system

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2023.08.003

Abstract

Abstract:

With the proposal of "dual carbon" target， the post-combustion carbon dioxide capture system has attracted wide attention， and its control has become a hot issue in academia. Due to the disturbance of flue gas flow， traditional controllers cannot satisfy the systems' requirement on flexible CO₂ capture. To make up for this shortcoming， a modified active disturbance rejection control（MADRC） method is proposed for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture systems. This control method modifies the linear active disturbance rejection control and introduces compensation function， improving the tracking and disturbance rejection ability of the carbon capture system. In addition， comparative simulations and Monte Carlo simulation experiments were conducted on a CO₂ capture system under different control strategies. At the capture rate set value of 88%， 96% and 90%， respectively， the MADRC was able to stabilize the system in a short time，which was about 125 s faster than that of active disturbance rejection control，and about 800 s faster than that of traditional PID control， indicating that the designed controller has good dynamic performance. Under the flue gas flow disturbance， the proposed controller can quickly suppress the disturbance， and according to Monte Carlo simulation results， the IAE and ISE indexes of the proposed controller are smaller than those of the active disturbance rejection controller and the traditional PID controller， indicating that the proposed controller has a strong robustness and anti-disturbance capability， verifying the effectiveness of the controller.

Key words: post-combustion CO₂ capture system, modified active disturbance rejection control, Monte Carlo simulation, carbon capture, utilization and storage

CLC Number:

TK019：TM761

LI Pengzhen, JIA Bingke, LIU Yanhong, WU Zhenlong. Modified active disturbance rejection control on the post-combustion CO₂ capture system[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2023, 45(8): 18-25.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

The parameters of different controllers

控制器	参数
PID	k_p=316.4, k_i=0.991 5
ADRC	b₀=0.000 6, ω_c=0.008, ω_o=1.6
MADRC	b₀=0.05, ω_c=48, ω_o=3, $G c p (s) = 1 432.563 37 s + 1$

Table 1

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

References 31

[1]	WILBERFORCE T, OLABI A, SAYED E, et al. Progress in carbon capture technologies[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 761: 143203. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143203
[2]	ALI M, ELSAID K, WILBERFORCE T, et al. Environmental aspects of fuel cells: A review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 752: 141803. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141803
[3]	LIN Q, ZHANG X, WANG T, et al. Technical perspective of carbon capture, utilization, and storage[J]. Engineering, 2022, 14: 27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.12.013
[4]	SHIN W, RYU J, CHOI H, et al. Monitoring the movement of artificially injected CO₂ at a shallow experimental site in Korea using carbon isotopes[J]. Environmental Management, 2020, 258:110030
[5]	中共中央国务院关于完整准确全面贯彻新发展理念做好碳达峰碳中和工作的意见[EB/OL].(2021-10-24)[2023-03-17]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/24/content_5644613.htm.
[6]	CHAO C, DENG Y, DEWIL R, et al. Post-combustion carbon capture[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 138: 110490. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490
[7]	温翯, 韩伟, 车春霞, 等. 燃烧后二氧化碳捕集技术与应用进展[J]. 精细化工, 2022, 39(8): 1584-1595.
	WEN He, HAN Wei, CHE Chunxia, et al. Progress of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technology development and applications[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2022, 39(8): 1584-1595.
[8]	胡长征, 王雅博, 刘圣春. MEA溶液在生物质电厂和燃煤电厂捕集CO₂中的应用对比[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(6): 78-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.06.009
	HU Changzheng, WANG Yabo, LIU Shengchun. Application of MEA solution in the CO₂ capture in biomass power plants and coal-fired power plants[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(6): 78-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.06.009
[9]	LAWAL A, WANG M, STEPHENSON P, et al. Dynamic modelling and analysis of post-combustion CO₂ chemical absorption process for coal-fired power plants[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(10): 2791-2801. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.030
[10]	LAWAL A, WANG M, STEPHENSON P, et al. Demonstrating full-scale post combustion CO₂ capture for coal-fired power plants through dynamic modelling and simulation[J]. Fuel, 2012, 101: 115-128. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.056
[11]	CORMOS A, VASILE M, CRISTEA M. Flexible operation of CO₂ capture processes integrated with power plant using advanced control techniques[J]. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 2015, 37:1547-1552.
[12]	HE X, WANG Y, BHATTACHARYYA D, et al. Dynamic modeling and advanced control of post-combustion CO₂ capture plants[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2018, 131: 430-439. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.12.020
[13]	AKINOLA T, OKO E, WU X, et al. Nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) of the solvent-based post-combustion CO₂ capture process[J]. Energy, 2020, 213: 118840. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118840
[14]	MEJDLL T, HVAMSDAL H, HAUGER S, et al. Demonstration of non-linear model predictive control for optimal flexible operation of a CO₂ capture plant[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2022, 117: 103645. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103645
[15]	PATRON G, RICARDEZ S. An integrated real-time optimization, control, and estimation scheme for post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 308: 118302. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118302
[16]	LI Z, DING Z, WANG M, et al. Model-free adaptive control for MEA-based post-combustion carbon capture process[J]. Fuel, 2018, 224: 637-643. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.096
[17]	WU X, SHEN J, LI Y, et al. Dynamic behavior investigations and disturbance rejection predictive control of solvent-based post-combustion CO₂ capture process[J]. Fuel, 2019, 242: 624-637. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.075
[18]	PATRON G, RICARDEZ S. A robust nonlinear model predictive controller for a post-combustion CO₂ capture absorber unit[J]. Fuel, 2020, 265: 116932. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116932
[19]	ZHANG Q, TURTON R, BHATTACHARYYA D. Nonlinear model-predictive control and H_∞ robust control for a post combustion CO₂ capture process[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 70: 105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.01.015
[20]	LIAO P, LI Y, WU X, et al. Flexible operation of large-scale coal-fired power plant integrated with solvent-based post-combustion CO₂ capture based on neural network inverse control[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 95: 102985. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.102985
[21]	WU X, SHEN J, WANG M, et al. Intelligent predictive control of large-scale solvent-based CO₂ capture plant using artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization[J]. Energy, 2020, 196: 117070. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117070
[22]	HAN J. From PID to active disturbance rejection control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009, 56(3): 900-906. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621
[23]	GAO Z. Active disturbance rejection control: A paradigm shift in feedback control system design[C]//Proceedings of the 2006 American Control Conference. Minneapolis, USA, 2006: 2399-2405.
[24]	PAN Z, WANG X, HOANG T, et al. An enhanced phase-locked loop for non-ideal grids combining linear active disturbance controller with moving average filter[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2023, 149: 109021. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109021
[25]	WANG R, WU Z, LIN P, et al. Speed and voltage controllers design for the permanent magnet starter/generator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2023, 70(8): 8314-8323. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2023.3239923
[26]	CHEN G, JIANG Y, GUO K. Neural active disturbance rejection adaptive lateral manipulation control method for unmanned driving robot[J]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2023, 15(1):397-399.
[27]	WANG Y, FANG S, HU J. Active disturbance rejection control based on deep reinforcement learning of PMSM for more electric aircraft[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2023, 38(1):406-416. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3206089
[28]	QIN H, TAN P, CHEN Z, et al. Deep reinforcement learning based active disturbance rejection control for ship course control[J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 484: 99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.06.096
[29]	李朋真, 刘艳红, 吴振龙. 高比例可再生能源的多区域电力系统负荷频率自抗扰控制[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(10): 33-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.10.005
	LI Pengzhen, LIU Yanhong, WU Zhenlong. Active disturbance rejection control on load frequency of multi-area power systems with high-proportion renewable energy[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(10): 33-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.10.005
[30]	WU Z, HE T, LI D, et al. Superheated steam temperature control based on modified active disturbance rejection control[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2019, 83: 83-97. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.09.027
[31]	ZHANG W, MA C, LI H, et al. DMC-PID cascade control for MEA-based post-combustion CO₂ capture process[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2022, 182: 701-713. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.04.030

Modified active disturbance rejection control on the post-combustion CO₂ capture system

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 31

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HU Changzheng, WANG Yabo, LIU Shengchun. Application of MEA solution in the CO2 capture in biomass power plants and coal-fired power plants [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(6): 78-85.
[2]	LU Xiaomin, ZHANG Ming, DENG Xing, WANG Liwei, TAO Yibin, HU Anping. Optimal capacity configuration for multi-station integration considering multiple uncertainties [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(1): 31-38.
[3]	YU Xiaobao, ZHENG Dandan, YANG Kang, KONG Jie, ZHANG Tianhao. Opportunities and challenges faced by energy and power industry with the goal of carbon neutrality and carbon peak [J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(6): 21-32.
[4]	ZHAO Ruikai, ZHAO Li, ZHAO Jun. Effectiveness and techno-economic analysis on temperature swing adsorption for CO₂ capture targeting at carbon neutrality [J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(6): 41-46.
[5]	QIAN Yu, YAN Aijing, XING Chenjian, WANG Ruilin. Research on a carbon capture system coupling parabolic trough solar collectors with coal-fired power generating units [J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(6): 61-68.
[6]	SUN Luchang, WANG Zhengrong, WU Chong, WANG Kailiang, ZHANG Shiming, HAN Wenquan. Research on operation optimization of a 10 000 t/a carbon capture project for coal-fired power plants [J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(6): 69-78.
[7]	ZHANG Shufan, CHENG Xingxing, WANG Luyuan, ZHANG Xingyu, WANG Zhiqiang. Research on carbon sequestration path of steel slag carbonation under carbon neutralization background [J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(6): 86-91.
[8]	WANG Yongzhen, HAN Kai, ZHAO Jun, WANG Jianxiao, GONG Yulie, FAN Yifan. Orientation and participation mode of geothermal power generation in the new power system [J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(11): 58-65.
[9]	XING Chenjian，QIAN Yu，ZHOU Ran，WANG Ruilin*. Analysis of utilization modes combining concentrating photovoltaic power generation and photovoltaic residual heat driving carbon capture [J]. Huadian Technology, 2020, 42(4): 84-88.
[10]	QIAO Wenjuan. Charging load prediction of electric vehicles based on Monte Carlo simulation [J]. Huadian Technology, 2018, 40(6): 19-22.
[11]	SUN Luchang1, SHEN Yuhui1, SAITO Satoshi2, MO Liping3, NIU Jianyu1, TIAN Lijuan1. Feasibility study of retrofitting carbon capture sysetem for gas steam combined cycle power plant [J]. Huadian Technology, 2016, 38(4): 1-7.
[12]	LI Xiangling;SUN Shouyi;XU Wei. Analysis on feasibility of carbon capture and carbon capture & utilization & sequestration technology [J]. Huadian Technology, 2011, 33(7): 68-71.