基于综合可调度潜力评估的电动汽车优先调度策略

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.11.001

综合智慧能源 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 1-11.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.11.001

• 经济协调调度 • 下一篇

基于综合可调度潜力评估的电动汽车优先调度策略

李昊¹^,²(), 季振亚¹^,²^,^*(), 刘晓峰¹^,²(), 张仕玮¹^,²(), 包宇庆¹^,²(), 王维¹^,²()

1.南京师范大学电气与自动化工程学院，南京210023
2.江苏省气电互联综合能源工程实验室，南京210023

收稿日期:2022-06-27 修回日期:2022-09-16 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-21
通讯作者: 季振亚
作者简介:李昊（1998），男，在读硕士研究生，从事电动汽车与电网互动方面的研究，lihao.stu@foxmail.com；
刘晓峰（1991），男，讲师，博士，从事电网需求响应与电力市场方面的研究，liuxiaofeng@njnu.edu.cn；
张仕玮（1997），男，在读硕士研究生，从事电动汽车与电网互动方面的研究，309021129@qq.com；
包宇庆（1987），男，副教授，博士，从事电网需求侧管理方面的研究，baoyuqing@njnu.edu.cn；
王维（1988），男，副教授，博士，从事智能电网与综合能源系统方面的研究，61207@njnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(52107100);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20190710)

Electric vehicle priority dispatch policy based on comprehensive dispatchable potential assessment model

LI Hao¹^,²(), JI Zhenya¹^,²^,^*(), LIU Xiaofeng¹^,²(), ZHANG Shiwei¹^,²(), BAO Yuqing¹^,²(), WANG Wei¹^,²()

1. School of Electrical and Automation Engineering， Nanjing Normal University， Nanjing 210023，China
2. Engineering Laboratory of Gas-Electricity Integrated Energy of Jiangsu Province， Nanjing 210023， China

Received:2022-06-27 Revised:2022-09-16 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-21
Contact: JI Zhenya

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在实现“双碳”目标的过程中，电动汽车的规模不断增大，其充放电对电网运行产生显著影响。考虑当前对单一电动汽车调度造成的控制指令下发数量较大的问题，分别从电动汽车侧与配电网侧2个角度，提出可调度能力评估指数与效益评估指数。构建电动汽车综合可调度潜力评估模型，对电动汽车群体划分优先调度区并下发指令，减少调度电动汽车的次数。为缓解电动汽车区域流动性给模型求解带来的困难，使用了一种以W-GAN以及 k-means聚类算法为基础的电动汽车分类方法。以3个削峰填谷算例为基础，分析了4个电动汽车群体的可调度潜力与调度效果。仿真结果表明，所提出的可调度能力评估指数、调度效益评估指数具有一定的合理性，且运用综合可调度潜力评估模型划分优先调度区可在较少调度电动汽车的情况下完成较好的削峰填谷效果。

关键词: 电动汽车, 潜力评估, 削峰填谷, 可调度能力, 电动汽车与电网互动, “双碳”目标, 需求响应

Abstract:

The number of electric vehicles is mounting in the process of achieving "dual carbon" target. And their charging and discharging behaviours significantly impact the operation of power grid. In response to the numerous control instructions given to schedule every single electric vehicle（EV）， considering from EV side and distribution network side， a dispatchable capacity assessment index and a benefit assessment index are proposed. And a comprehensive dispatchable potential assessment model for EVs is established. Then， EVs can be divided into different groups and those in dispatch priority zones will be given schedule instructions preferentially. To alleviate the difficulty brought by EV mobility between regions to the model solving， an EV grouping method based on W-GAN and k-means clustering algorithm is used. Based on three peak load regulation cases， the dispatchable potential and dispatch performance of four EV groups are analysed. The simulation results show that the dispatchable capacity assessment index and the dispatching benefit assessment index of the proposed method are reasonable. Giving scheduling priority to the divided EV dispatch priority zones selected by the integrated dispatchable potential assessment model can accomplish peak load regulation with less dispatching times.

Key words: electric vehicle, potential statement, peak load regulation, dispatchable capacity, vehicle to grid, "dual carbon" target, demand response

中图分类号:

TM73:TK01

李昊, 季振亚, 刘晓峰, 张仕玮, 包宇庆, 王维. 基于综合可调度潜力评估的电动汽车优先调度策略[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(11): 1-11.

LI Hao, JI Zhenya, LIU Xiaofeng, ZHANG Shiwei, BAO Yuqing, WANG Wei. Electric vehicle priority dispatch policy based on comprehensive dispatchable potential assessment model[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(11): 1-11.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表1

图9

图10

参考文献 26

[1]	JI Z, HUANG X. Plug-in electric vehicle charging infrastructure deployment of China towards 2020: Policies, methodologies,and challenges[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 90: 710-727.
[2]	陈珂, 陈宇扬, 汤卓凡, 等. 具有储能作用的用户侧资源运行特性[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(2): 8-14.
	CHEN Ke, CHEN Yuyang, TANG Zhuofan, et al. Operation characteristics of user-side resources with energy storage function[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(2): 8-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.02.002
[3]	FAN Zhong. A distributed demand response algorithm and its application to PHEV charging in smart grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012, 3(3): 1280-1290. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2012.2185075
[4]	陈丽丹. 电动汽车广泛接入对电网的影响及其调控策略研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018.
[5]	胡泽春, 邵成成, 何方, 等. 电网与交通网耦合的设施规划与运行优化研究综述及展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(12): 3-19.
	HU Zechun, SHAO chengcheng, HE Fang, et al. Review and prospect of research on facility planning and optimal operation for coupled power and transportation networks[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(12): 3-19.
[6]	冯仕杰, 刘韬, 潘萨, 等. 基于分层优化的电动汽车有序充电策略[J]. 电气工程学报, 2021, 16(3): 137-144.
	FENG Shijie, LIU Tao, PAN Sa, et al. Coordinated charging strategy for electric vehicles based on hierarchical optimization[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2021, 16(3): 137-144.
[7]	翁国庆, 张有兵, 戚军, 等. 多类型电动汽车电池集群参与微网储能的V2G可用容量评估[J]. 电工技术学报, 2014, 29(8): 36-45.
	WENG Guoqing, ZHANG Youbing, QI Jun, et al. Evaluation for V2G available capacity of battery groups of electric vehicles as energy storage elements in microgrid[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2014, 29(8): 36-45.
[8]	杨晓东, 任帅杰, 张有兵, 等. 电动汽车可调度能力模型与日内优先调度策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(2): 84-93.
	YANG Xiaodong, RENG Shuaijie, ZHANG Youbing, et al. Schedulable ability model and priority-based intraday scheduling strategy for electric vehicle[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(2): 84-93.
[9]	程杉, 赵子凯, 陈诺, 等. 计及耦合因素的电动汽车充电负荷时空分布预测[J]. 电力工程技术, 2022, 41(3): 194-201, 208.
	CHENG Shan, ZHAO Zikai, CHEN Nuo, et al. Prediction of temporal and spatial distribution of electric vehicle charging load considering coupling factors[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2022, 41(3):194-201, 208.
[10]	陈培培, 包宇庆, 陈刚, 等. 计及需求响应电量约束的日前调度策略[J]. 电力工程技术, 2018, 37(4): 9-13.
	CHEN Peipei, BAO Yuqing, CHEN Gang, et al. A day-ahead scheduling strategy considering power constraint of demand response[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2018, 37(4): 9-13.
[11]	江明, 许庆强, 季振亚. 基于时序差分学习的充电站有序充电方法[J]. 电力工程技术, 2021, 40(1): 181-187.
	JIANG Ming, XU Qingqiang, JI Zhenya, et al. Coordinated charging approach for charging stations based on temporal difference learning[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2021, 40(1): 181-187.
[12]	季振亚, 黄学良, 张梓麒, 等. 基于随机优化的综合能源系统能量管理[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(1): 45-53.
	JI Zhenya, HUANG Xueliang, ZHANG Ziqi, et al. Energy management for integrated energy systems based on stochastic optimization[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 45-53.
[13]	赵厚翔, 沈晓东, 吕林, 等. 基于GAN的负荷数据修复及其在EV短期负荷预测中的应用[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(16): 143-151.
	ZHAO Houxiang, SHEN Xiaodong, LYU Lin, et al. Load data restoration based on generative adversarial network and its application in short-term load forecasting of electric vehicle[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(16): 143-151.
[14]	张洁, 杨春玉, 鞠非, 等. 基于二次聚类的大规模电动汽车有序充电调度策略优化[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(10): 2978-2982. doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.10.2978
	ZHANG Jie, YANG Chunyu, JU Fei, et al. Optimization of ordered charging strategy for large scale electric vehicles based on quadratic clustering[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37(10): 2978-2982. doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.10.2978
[15]	胡泽春, 宋永华, 刘辉. 电动汽车与电网互动的调控策略[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
[16]	王剑晓, 钟海旺, 夏清, 等. 基于成本-效益分析的温控负荷需求响应模型与方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(5): 45-53.
	WANG Jianxiao, ZHONG Haiwang, XIA Qing, et al. Model and method of demand response for thermostatically-controlled loads based on cost-benefit analysis[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(5): 45-53.
[17]	CHEN Y, WANG Y, KIRSCHEN D S, et al. Model-free renewable scenario generation using generative adversarial networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 33(99): 3265-3275. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2794541
[18]	孙广明, 陈良亮, 王瑞升, 等. 基于深度强化学习的充光储能源站调度策略[J]. 电力工程技术, 2021, 40(5): 17-24.
	SUN Guangming, CHEN Mingliang, WANG Ruisheng, et al. A deep reinforcement learning-based scheduling strategy of photovoltaic-storage-charging integrated energy stations[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2021, 40(5): 17-24.
[19]	ERDOGAN N, ERDEN F, KISACIKOGLU M. A fast and efficient coordinated vehicle-to-grid discharging control scheme for peak shaving in power distribution system[J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2018, 6(3): 555-566. doi: 10.1007/s40565-017-0375-z
[20]	WANG Q, ZHOU X, WANG C, et al. WGAN-based synthetic minority over-sampling technique: Improving semantic fine-grained classification for lung nodules in CT images[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 18450-18463.
[21]	ZHOU S, XU Z, FEI L. Method for determining the optimal number of clusters based on agglomerative hierarchical clustering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2017, 28(99):3007-3017. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2608001
[22]	JEON J Y, CHOI J S, BYUN H G. Implementation of elbow method to improve the gases classification performance based on the RBFN-NSG algorithm[J]. Journal of Sensor Science and Technology, 2016, 25(6): 431-434. doi: 10.5369/JSST.2016.25.6.431
[23]	王帅, 杜欣慧, 姚宏民, 等. 面向含多种用户类型的负荷曲线聚类研究[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42(10): 3401-3412.
	WANG Shuai, DU Xinhui, YAO Hongmin, et al. Research on load curve clustering with multiple user types[J]. Power System Technology, 2018, 42(10): 3401-3412.
[24]	徐智威, 胡泽春, 宋永华, 等. 充电站内电动汽车有序充电策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36(11): 38-43.
	XU Zhiwei, HU Zechun, SONG Yonghua, et al. Coordinated charging of plug in electric vehicles in charging stations[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36(11): 38-43.
[25]	张永新, 闫鹏领, 朱国栋. 电动汽车充电站站网互动运行优化技术研究与实践[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(6): 45-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.06.005
	ZHANG Yongxin, YAN Pengling, ZHU Guodong. Research and practice on the EV station-to-grid interactive operation optimization technology[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(6): 45-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.06.005
[26]	罗卓伟, 胡泽春, 宋永华, 等. 电动汽车充电负荷计算方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35(14): 36-42.
	LUO Zhuowei, HU Zechun, SONG Yonghua, et al. Study on plug-in electric vehicles charging load calculating[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35(14): 36-42.

群体	n_d	f'_a_,d	f'_e_,d	F_d	Q_d	w_a	w_e
1	1 460	0.107	1.000	0.564	0.653	0.448	0.511
2	1 250	0	0	0	0
3	2 100	0.232	0.269	0.251	0.291
4	5 190	1.000	0.733	0.864	1.000

基于综合可调度潜力评估的电动汽车优先调度策略

Electric vehicle priority dispatch policy based on comprehensive dispatchable potential assessment model

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李彬, 胡纯瑾, 王婧. 基于EEMD-BiLSTM的可调节负荷预测方法[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(9): 33-39.
[2]	钟永洁, 纪陵, 李靖霞, 蒋衍君, 吴世伟, 王紫东. 虚拟电厂基础特征内涵与发展现状概述[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(6): 25-36.
[3]	张永新, 闫鹏领, 朱国栋. 电动汽车充电站站网互动运行优化技术研究与实践[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(6): 45-51.
[4]	刘静, 史梦鸽, 胡永锋. 含电池储能系统的智能楼宇多阶段能量管理策略[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(3): 29-37.
[5]	张凯杰, 丁国锋, 闻铭, 惠红勋, 丁一, 贺民, 褚杰锋, 谢康, 俞楚天, 张利军. 虚拟电厂的优化调度技术与市场机制设计综述[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(2): 60-72.
[6]	赵建立, 汤卓凡, 王桂林, 陈宇扬, 王隗东, 陈珂, 吴英俊. 具有储能作用的用户侧资源运行特性[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(2): 8-14.
[7]	吉斌, 孙绘, 昌力, 张丹丹. 黏性电力用户参与需求侧响应的行为决策建模与分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(2): 80-88.
[8]	敦文斌, 陈业, 王大伟, 马晓慧. 零碳视角下电气化码头源网荷储协同优化研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(12): 68-74.
[9]	王康平, 黄曲粲, 张兴科, 万芳茹, 魏朝阳, 刘财华, 田浩, 魏聪, 周霞. 考虑调峰成本的大规模电动汽车分群调度策略[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(11): 12-19.
[10]	许志荣, 张高瑞. 响应用户有限理性需求的微电网优化策略[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(11): 43-49.
[11]	郑庆荣, 陆颖杰, 向佳霓, 陈宇扬, 宫飞翔, 袁金斗, 吴英俊. 用户侧可调资源分类与特性分析研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(11): 50-55.
[12]	吴俊达, 赵毅, 孙文瑶. 适用于环境-经济调度需求的火电机组碳排放特性模型[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(11): 56-62.
[13]	张会福. 多能互补系统经济运行方法研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(11): 79-86.
[14]	屈涛涛, 綦晓, 蒋文珂, 杜鸣, 潘岩. 考虑风电机组虚拟惯量的新型电力系统频率分布式模型预测控制策略[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(10): 25-32.
[15]	王佑, 孙立明, 薛亚丽. 基于调度信号的自抗扰控制器设计研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(10): 50-56.