Advances of composite membranes in CO2 separation

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1951.2021.11.014

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality, it is necessary to develop CO₂ capture, storage and resource utilization （CCUS） technology to control CO₂ emissions. As one of the most common gas separation technologies, membrane-based separation has been widely used in the CO₂ capture of flue gas from power plants and the purification of natural gas. It has the advantages of low energy consumption, easy operation, small site area, easy expansion and low operating costs,compared to absorption, adsorption and cryogenic methods. However, pure inorganic membranes and polymer membranes can hardly be used in large-scale applications for their own shortcomings. The development of composite membranes with superior gas separation performance has become the hotspot.The research progress of composite membranes on CO₂ capture was reviewed. Being sorted by their structures,composite membranes include mixed-matrix membranes and supported liquid membranes. The separation performances of different composite membranes were compared. Based on their advantages and disadvantages,the key issues restricting the development of composite membranes were analyzed and discussed. Finally, the development direction of composite membrane-based gas separation technology was also prospected.

Key words: carbon neutrality, CCUS, membrane-based separation, mixed-matrix membrane, supported liquid membrane, ionic liquid, carbonic anhydrase

CLC Number:

X701.7

LIAN Shaohan, LI Run, ZHANG Zezhou, LIU Qingling, HAN Rui, ZHAO Jun, SONG Chunfeng. Advances of composite membranes in CO₂ separation[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(11): 128-137.

Figures/Tables 5

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

References 76

[1]	胡小夫, 沈建永, 王桦, 等. 氨基修饰多孔固体吸附剂吸附CO₂的研究进展[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(10):36-40.
	HU Xiaofu, SHEN Jianyong, WANG Hua, et al. Research progress in amino-modification porous solid adsorbents applied in CO₂ adsorption[J]. Huadian Technology, 2020, 42(10):36-40.
[2]	赵睿恺, 赵力, 赵军. 面向碳中和目标的变温吸附碳捕集效能与技术经济性分析[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(6):41-46.
	ZHAO Ruikai, ZHAO Li, ZHAO Jun. Effectiveness and techno-economic analysis on temperature swing adsorption for CO₂ capture targeting at carbon neutrality[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(6):41-46.
[3]	邢晨健, 钱煜, 周燃, 等. 太阳能聚光光伏-余热碳捕集利用方式分析[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(4):84-88.
	XING Chenjian, QIAN Yu, ZHOU Ran, et al. Analysis of utilization modes combining concentrating photovoltaic power generation and photovoltaic residual heat driving carbon capture[J]. Huadian Technology, 2020, 42(4):84-88.
[4]	YAN X, ANGUILLE S, BENDAHAN M, et al. Ionic liquids combined with membrane separation processes: A review[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 222:230-253. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.103
[5]	郭智, 张新妙, 章晨林, 等. 膜分离法分离烟气中CO₂材料及应用研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2016, 36(6):42-45,47.
	GUO Zhi, ZHANG Xinmiao, ZHANG Chenlin, et al. Research development of membrane materials for separation of CO₂ from flue gas[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2016, 36(6):42-45,47.
[6]	ZHAN T, WU T, SHI Y, et al. Influence of synjournal parameters on preparation of AlPO-18 membranes by single DIPEA for CO₂/CH₄ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 601:117853. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117853
[7]	LIN R, VILLACORTA B, GE L, et al. Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: An overview on filler/polymer interfaces[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(2):293-312. doi: 10.1039/C7TA07294E
[8]	冯雨轩, 耿康, 曹凯鹏. 混合基质膜在CO₂气体分离中的研究进展[J]. 高分子通报, 2018(8):105-111.
	FENG Yuxuan, GENG Kang, CAO Kaipeng. Recent advances of mixed matrix membranes in CO₂ separation[J]. Polymer Bulletin, 2018(8):105-111.
[9]	王少飞. 聚氧乙烯基碳捕集膜的多级结构调控与传递机制强化[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2016.
[10]	TRICKETT C A, HELAL A, AL-MAYTHALONY B A, et al. The chemistry of metal-organic frameworks for CO₂ capture, regeneration and conversion[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2017, 2(8):1-16.
[11]	VINOBA M, BHAGIYALAKSHMI M, ALQAHEEM Y, et al. Recent progress of fillers in mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation:A review[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 188:431-450. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.051
[12]	QUAN S, LI S W, XIAO Y C, et al. CO₂-selective mixed matrix membranes(MMMs) containing graphene oxide (GO) for enhancing sustainable CO₂ capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 56:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.010
[13]	ZHENG W, DING R, YANG K, et al. ZIF-8 nanoparticles with tunable size for enhanced CO₂ capture of Pebax based MMMs[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 214:111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.010
[14]	MESHKAT S, KALIAGUINE S, RODRIGUE D. Comparison between ZIF-67 and ZIF-8 in Pebax® MH-1657 mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 235:116150. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116150
[15]	MAJUMDAR S, TOKAY B, MARTIN-GIL V, et al. Mg-MOF-74/Polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 238:116411. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116411
[16]	MESHKAT S, KALIAGUINE S, RODRIGUE D. Mixed matrix membranes based on amine and non-amine MIL-53(Al) in Pebax®MH-1657 for CO₂ separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 200:177-190. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.038
[17]	GAO J, MAO H, JIN H, et al. Functionalized ZIF-7/Pebax® 2533 mixed matrix membranes for CO₂/N₂ separation[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2020, 297:110030. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110030
[18]	MUBASHIR M, YEONG Y F, LAU K K, et al. Efficient CO₂/N₂ and CO₂/CH₄ separation using NH₂-MIL-53(Al)/cellulose acetate(CA) mixed matrix membranes[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2018, 199:140-151.
[19]	DUAN K, WANG J, ZHANG Y, et al. Covalent organic frameworks(COFs) functionalized mixed matrix membrane for effective CO₂/N₂ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 572:588-595. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.054
[20]	WU X, TIAN Z, WANG S, et al. Mixed matrix membranes comprising polymers of intrinsic microporosity and covalent organic framework for gas separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 528:273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.042
[21]	SHAHID S, NIJMEIJER K. Performance and plasticization behavior of polymer-MOF membranes for gas separation at elevated pressures[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 470:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.034
[22]	MAJUMDAR S, TOKAY B, MARTIN-GIL V, et al. Mg-MOF-74/Polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 238:116411. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116411
[23]	AHMAD M Z, NAVARRO M, LHOTKA M, et al. Enhanced gas separation performance of 6FDA-DAM based mixed matrix membranes by incorporating MOF UiO-66 and its derivatives[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 558:64-77. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.040
[24]	SONG C, LI R, FAN Z, et al. CO₂/N₂ separation performance of Pebax/MIL-101 and Pebax /NH₂-MIL-101 mixed matrix membranes and intensification via sub-ambient operation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 238:11650016.
[25]	ANJUM M W, VERMOORTELE F, KHAN A L, et al. Modulated UiO-66-based mixed-matrix membranes for CO₂ separation[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(45):25193-25201.
[26]	CHENG Y, ZHAI L, YING Y, et al. Highly efficient CO₂ capture by mixed matrix membranes containing three-dimensional covalent organic framework fillers[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(9):4549-4560. doi: 10.1039/C8TA10333J
[27]	WANG M, QUAN K, ZHENG X, et al. Facilitated transport membranes by incorporating self-exfoliated covalent organic nanosheets for CO₂/CH₄ separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 237(135):116457. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116457
[28]	YUSUF M, KHAN A, ADEWOLE J K, et al. Biomass derived carboxylated carbon nanosheets blended polyetherimide membranes for enhanced CO₂/CH₄ separation[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 75:103156. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103156
[29]	CHENG Y, YING Y, ZHAI L, et al. Mixed matrix membranes containing MOF@COF hybrid fillers for efficient CO₂/CH₄ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 573:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.060
[30]	JIA M, FENG Y, QIU J, et al. Amine-functionalized MOFs@GO as filler in mixed matrix membrane for selective CO₂ separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 213:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.029
[31]	BLANCHARD L A, GU Z, BRENNECKE J F. High-pressure phase behavior of ionic liquid/CO₂ systems[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2001, 105(12):2437-2444. doi: 10.1021/jp003309d
[32]	ZENG S, ZHANG X, BAI L, et al. Ionic-liquid-based CO₂ capture systems: Structure, interaction and process[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(14):9625-9673. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00072
[33]	ZHANG X, ZHANG X, DONG H, et al. Carbon capture with ionic liquids: Overview and progress[J]. Energy and Environmental Science, 2012, 5(5):6668-6681. doi: 10.1039/c2ee21152a
[34]	AGHAIE M, REZAEI N, ZENDEHBOUDI S. A systematic review on CO₂ capture with ionic liquids: Current status and future prospects[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 96:502-525. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.004
[35]	GAO H, BAI L, HAN J, et al. Functionalized ionic liquid membranes for CO₂ separation[J]. Chemical Communications, 2018, 54(90):12671-12685. doi: 10.1039/C8CC07348A
[36]	KLEPIĆ M, SETNIČKOVÁ K, LANČ M, et al. Permeation and sorption properties of CO₂-selective blend membranes based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide([EMIM][DCA]) ionic liquid for effective CO₂/H₂ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 597:117623. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117623
[37]	ZIA-UL-MUSTAFA M, MUKHTAR H, NORDIN N A H M, et al. Effect of imidazolium based ionic liquids on PES membrane for CO₂/CH₄ separation[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2019, 16:1976-1982. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.076
[38]	TOMÉ L C, ISIK M, FREIRE C S R, et al. Novel pyrrolidinium-based polymeric ionic liquids with cyano counter-anions: High performance membrane materials for post-combustion CO₂ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 483:155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.020
[39]	TEODORO R M, TOMÉ L C, MANTIONE D, et al. Mixing poly(ionic liquid)s and ionic liquids with different cyano anions: Membrane forming ability and CO₂/N₂ separation properties[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 552:341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.019
[40]	DAI Z, ANSALONI L, RYAN J J, et al. Incorporation of an ionic liquid into a midblock-sulfonated multiblock polymer for CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 588:117193. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117193
[41]	BERNARDO P, JANSEN J C, BAZZARELLI F, et al. Gas transport properties of Pebax®/room temperature ionic liquid gel membranes[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 97:73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.041
[42]	FARROKHARA M, DOROSTI F. New high permeable polysulfone/ionic liquid membrane for gas separation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020.
[43]	YIN J, ZHANG C, YU Y, et al. Tuning the microstructure of crosslinked Poly(ionic liquid) membranes and gels via a multicomponent reaction for improved CO₂ capture performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 593:117405. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117405
[44]	LIM J Y, LEE J H, PARK M S, et al. Hybrid membranes based on ionic-liquid-functionalized poly(vinyl benzene chloride) beads for CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 572:365-373. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.030
[45]	DAI Z, ABOUKEILA H, ANSALONI L, et al. Nafion/PEG hybrid membrane for CO₂ separation: Effect of PEG on membrane micro-structure and performance[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 214:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.062
[46]	SANAEEPUR H, AHMADI R, EBADI AMOOGHIN A, et al. A novel ternary mixed matrix membrane containing glycerol-modified poly(ether-block-amide)(Pebax 1657)/copper nanoparticles for CO₂ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 573:234-246. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.012
[47]	AZIZI N, MAHDAVI H R, ISANEJAD M, et al. Effects of low and high molecular mass PEG incorporation into different types of poly(ether-b-amide) copolymers on the permeation properties of CO₂ and CH₄[J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2017, 24(9):141. doi: 10.1007/s10965-017-1297-1
[48]	DAI Z, NOBLE R D, GIN D L, et al. Combination of ionic liquids with membrane technology: A new approach for CO₂ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 497:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.060
[49]	GUO X, QIAO Z, LIU D, et al. Mixed-matrix membranes for CO₂ separation: Role of the third component[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(43):24738-24759. doi: 10.1039/C9TA09012F
[50]	VU M T, LIN R, DIAO H, et al. Effect of ionic liquids (ILs) on MOFs/polymer interfacial enhancement in mixed matrix membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 587:117157. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.081
[51]	HUANG G, ISFAHANI A P, MUCHTAR A, et al. Pebax/ionic liquid modified graphene oxide mixed matrix membranes for enhanced CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 565:370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.026
[52]	RHYU S Y, CHO Y, KANG S W. Nanocomposite membranes consisting of poly(ethylene oxide)/ionic liquid/ZnO for CO₂ separation[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2020(2019):2-7.
[53]	LEE W G, KANG S W. Highly selective poly(ethylene oxide)/ionic liquid electrolyte membranes containing CrO₃ for CO₂/N₂ separation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 356:312-317. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.049
[54]	KAMBLE A R, PATEL C M, MURTHY Z V P. Polyethersulfone based MMMs with 2D materials and ionic liquid for CO₂, N₂ and CH₄ separation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 262:110256. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110256
[55]	DING S, LI X, DING S, et al. Ionic liquid-decorated nanocages for cooperative CO₂ transport in mixed matrix membranes[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 239:116539. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116539
[56]	KALANTARI S, OMIDKHAH M, EBADI AMOOGHIN A, et al. Superior interfacial design in ternary mixed matrix membranes to enhance the CO₂ separation performance[J]. Applied Materials Today, 2020, 18:100491. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100491
[57]	YASMEEN I, ILYAS A, SHAMAIR Z, et al. Synergistic effects of highly selective ionic liquid confined in nanocages: Exploiting the three component mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2020, 155:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.01.006
[58]	MA J, YING Y, GUO X, et al. Fabrication of mixed-matrix membrane containing metal-organic framework composite with task-specific ionic liquid for efficient CO₂ separation[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(19):7281-7288. doi: 10.1039/C6TA02611G
[59]	LOLOEI M, OMIDKHAH M, MOGHADASSI A, et al. Preparation and characterization of Matrimid® 5218 based binary and ternary mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 39:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.016
[60]	MUHAMMAD R D, ISLAM A, HAMIDULLAH U, et al. Effect of alumina on the performance and characterization of cross-linked PVA/PEG600 blended membranes for CO₂/N₂ separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 210:627-635. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.026
[61]	AZIZI N, MOHAMMADI T, MOSAYEBI R. Synjournal of a new nanocomposite membrane (PEBAX-1074/PEG-400/TiO₂) in order to separate CO₂ from CH₄[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 37:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.038
[62]	YOON K W, KIM H, KANG Y S, et al. 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate/zinc oxide composite membrane for high CO₂ separation performance[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 320:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.026
[63]	IARIKOV D D, HACARLIOGLU P, OYAMA S T. Supported room temperature ionic liquid membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 166(1):401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.060
[64]	SCHOTT J A, DO-THANH C, MAHURIN S M, et al. Supported bicyclic amidine ionic liquids as a potential CO₂/N₂ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 565:203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.012
[65]	KAROUSOS D S, LABROPOULOS A I, SAPALIDIS A, et al. Nanoporous ceramic supported ionic liquid membranes for CO₂ and SO₂ removal from flue gas[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 313:777-790. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.005
[66]	LIU Z, LIU C, LI L, et al. CO₂ separation by supported ionic liquid membranes and prediction of separation performance[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 53:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.041
[67]	SHAMAIR Z, HABIB N, GILANI M A, et al. Theoretical and experimental investigation of CO₂ separation from CH₄ and N₂ through supported ionic liquid membranes[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 268:115016. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115016
[68]	LU P, LIU Y, ZHOU T, et al. Recent advances in layered double hydroxides (LDHs) as two-dimensional membrane materials for gas and liquid separations[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 567:89-103. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.09.041
[69]	CHEN D, YING W, GUO Y, et al. Enhanced gas separation through nanoconfined ionic liquid in laminated MoS₂ membrane[J]. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2017, 9(50):44251-44257. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15762
[70]	CHEN D, WANG W, YING W, et al. CO₂-philic WS₂ laminated membranes with a nanoconfined ionic liquid[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(34):16566-16573. doi: 10.1039/C8TA04753G
[71]	YING W, CAI J, ZHOU K, et al. Ionic liquid selectively facilitates CO₂ transport through graphene oxide membrane[J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(6):5385-5393. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b00367
[72]	YING W, HAN B, LIN H, et al. Laminated mica nanosheets supported ionic liquid membrane for CO₂ separation[J]. Nanotechnology, 2019, 30(38):38570.
[73]	POLAT H M, ZEESHAN M, UZUN A, et al. Unlocking CO₂ separation performance of ionic liquid/CuBTC composites: Combining experiments with molecular simulations[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 373:1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.113
[74]	KARUNAKARAN M, VILLALOBOS L F, KUMAR M, et al. Graphene oxide doped ionic liquid ultrathin composite membranes for efficient CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(2):649-656. doi: 10.1039/C6TA08858A
[75]	ABDELRAHIM M Y M, MARTINS C F, NEVES L A, et al. Supported ionic liquid membranes immobilized with carbonic anhydrases for CO₂ transport at high temperatures[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 528:225-230. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.033
[76]	FU Y, JIANG Y B, DUNPHY D, et al. Ultra-thin enzymatic liquid membrane for CO₂ separation and capture[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1):1-12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w

填料/聚合物基质	CO₂的渗透性/Barrer	CO₂/N₂ 选择性	参考文献
GO/HCM	474	56.0	[12]
ZIF-8/Pebax	100	60.0	[13]
ZIF-67/Pebax	162	81.0	[14]
MIL-101/Pebax	71	47.0	[15]
MIL-53/Pebax	129	58.0	[16]
OH-ZIF/Pebax	273	38.0	[17]
NH₂-MIL-101/Pebax	74	43.0	[15]
NH₂-MIL-53/CA	53	23.0	[18]
NH₂-MIL-53/Pebax	149	55.0	[16]
COF-5/Pebax	493	49.0	[19]
SNW-1/PIM-1	7 954	20.0	[20]

填料/聚合物基质	CO₂的渗透性/ Barrer	CO₂/N₂ 选择性	参考文献
Glycerol/Pebax	50	233.0	[46]
[BMIM][CF₃SO₃] /Pebax	300	40.0	[41]
[Bmim][BF₄]/Nexar	200	130.0	[40]
Poly([Pyr11][C(CN)3]/[C2mim][C(CN)3]	439	64.0	[38]
Poly([Pyr11][C(CN)3]/[C2mim][B(CN)4]	472	54.0	[39]
mPEG/Nafion	446	31.0	[45]

成分	CO₂的渗透性/Barrer	CO₂/N₂ 选择性	CO₂/CH₄ 选择性	参考文献
Pebax/ILs/NiZnFe₄O₄	300	248.0	—	[56]
Pebax/Glycerol/Cu	64	200.0	—	[46]
Matrimid/PEG 200/ZSM-5	11	—	60.0	[59]
Pebax/[Hmim][NTf]/LDHN	644	—	34.0	[55]
PES/[EMIM][NTf₂]/h-BN	747 252	—	1.8	[54]
PES/[EMIM][NTf₂]/MoS₂	153 112	—	1.4	[54]

成分	CO₂的渗透性/Barrer	CO₂/N₂ 选择性	参考文献
[Benz][Ac]/PI	19	40.0	[67]
[BMIM][AC]/PVDF	520	22.0	[66]
[EtDBN][B(CN)4]/PES	1 583	48.0	[64]
SspCA/[C4mim][Tf2N]/PVDF	734	36.0	[75]

成分	CO₂的渗透性/GPU	CO₂/N₂ 选择性	参考文献
Mico/[BMIM][BF₄]	80	87.0	[72]
GO/[BMIM][BF₄]	68	382.0	[71]
WS₂/[BMIM][BF₄]	47	153.0	[70]
MoS₂/[BMIM][BF₄]	47	131.0	[69]
uGO/[EMIM][Ac]	37	130.0	[74]

Advances of composite membranes in CO₂ separation

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 76

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HAN Shiwang, ZHAO Ying, ZHANG Xingyu, XUAN Chengbo, ZHAO Tiantian, HOU Xukai, LIU Qianqian. Researches on hydrogen storage peak-shaving technology for new power systems to achieve carbon neutrality [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 20-26.
[2]	JIANG Ting, ZHAO Yajiao. Carbon emission reduction analysis for gas-based distributed integrated energy systems [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 27-32.
[3]	ZHANG Xu, ZHANG Haohao, GU Jihao. Study on difference analysis and sampling inference methods of room temperature spatial characteristics [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 51-58.
[4]	JIANG Shu, LIU Fangfang, LIU Yuanyuan, CHEN Qizhao, LIAN Li, REN Mengnan. Comprehensive cascade application of "geothermal energy +" in engineering practice [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 59-64.
[5]	YU Guo, WU Jun, XIA Re, CHEN Yihui, GUO Zihui, HUANG Wenxin. Study on the status quo and development trend of grid-forming converter technology [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 65-70.
[6]	TANG Qiwen, SHEN Qi, ZHU Jun, SU Yijing. Mechanism design and operation practice of Zhejiang frequency regulation ancillary service market [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 71-77.
[7]	YANG Ying, ZHANG Yanxiang, YAN Mufu. Research progress on preparation methods of medium and low temperature SOFC electrolytes [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(8): 50-57.
[8]	CHEN Hanyu, ZHOU Xiaoliang, LIU Limin, QIAN Xinyuan, WANG Zhou, HE Feifan, SHENG Yang. Research progress of hydrogen production from water electrolysis in proton-conducting solid electrolytic cells [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(8): 75-85.
[9]	LI Hua, ZHENG Hongwei, ZHOU Bowen, LI Guangdi, YANG Bo. Two-part tariff for pumped storage power plants in an integrated intelligent energy system [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 10-18.
[10]	WANG Sheng, TAN Jian, SHI Wenbo, ZOU Fenghua, CHEN Guang, WANG Linyu, HUI Hongxun, GUO Lei. Practices of the new power system in the UK and inspiration for the development of provincial power systems in China [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 19-32.
[11]	YE Zhaonian, ZHAO Changlu, WANG Yongzhen, HAN Kai, LIU Chaofan, HAN Juntao. Dual-objective optimization of energy networks with shared energy storage based on Nash bargaining [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 40-48.
[12]	ZHANG Rongquan, LI Gangqiang, BU Siqi, LIU Fang, ZHU Yuxiang. Economic operation of a multi-energy system based on adaptive learning rate firefly algorithm [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 49-57.
[13]	GUO Zuogang, YUAN Zhiyong, XU Min, LEI Jinyong, LI Pengyue, TAN Yingjie. Multi-energy flow calculation method for multi-energy complementary integrated energy systems [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 58-65.
[14]	LU Yao, GU Xiaoxi, YIN Shuo, CHEN Xing, JIN Man. Research on county-level self-balance transaction scheduling strategy for new energy considering section load rate [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 66-72.
[15]	XIE Dian, GAO Yajing, LU Xinbo, LIU Tianyang, ZHAO Liang, ZHAO Yong. Research on the implementation path of the transition from dual control on energy consumption to dual control on carbon emission [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 73-80.