Integrated Intelligent Energy ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 58-65.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.07.007
• Intelligent Power • Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Zuogang1(), YUAN Zhiyong1(), XU Min1(), LEI Jinyong1, LI Pengyue2, TAN Yingjie1
Received:
2022-05-06
Revised:
2022-06-25
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-07-19
CLC Number:
GUO Zuogang, YUAN Zhiyong, XU Min, LEI Jinyong, LI Pengyue, TAN Yingjie. Multi-energy flow calculation method for multi-energy complementary integrated energy systems[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 58-65.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.hdpower.net/EN/10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.07.007
Table 1
Simulation results of energy flow in a power network
节点 | 有功功率/kW | 无功功率/ (kV·A) | 电压标幺值 | 相角/rad | 节点 | 有功功率/kW | 无功功率/ (kV·A) | 电压标幺值 | 相角/rad |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 452.699 10 | 12 955.200 00 | 1.050 000 | 0 | 31 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.021 811 | 1.507 875 |
2 | -0.291 79 | -0.072 95 | 1.046 712 | 0.172 388 | 32 | -1.136 61 | -0.284 15 | 1.021 720 | 1.513 188 |
3 | -0.373 21 | -0.093 30 | 1.045 058 | 0.257 537 | 33 | -0.497 05 | -0.124 26 | 1.021 695 | 1.514 691 |
4 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.043 429 | 0.341 869 | 34 | -0.442 77 | -0.110 69 | 1.021 561 | 1.522 794 |
5 | -0.352 86 | -0.088 21 | 1.042 747 | 0.377 323 | 35 | -0.931 34 | -0.232 83 | 1.021 427 | 1.530 912 |
6 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.041 448 | 0.445 050 | 36 | 0.600 00 | 0 | 1.021 310 | 1.538 196 |
7 | -1.034 82 | -0.258 71 | 1.040 998 | 0.468 576 | 37 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.021 277 | 1.540 196 |
8 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.040 831 | 0.477 322 | 38 | -0.690 45 | -0.172 61 | 1.021 168 | 1.546 877 |
9 | -0.391 88 | -0.097 97 | 1.039 461 | 0.549 423 | 39 | -0.037 32 | -0.009 33 | 1.021 081 | 1.552 284 |
10 | -0.407 14 | -0.101 79 | 1.038 504 | 0.599 982 | 40 | -0.722 68 | -0.180 67 | 1.020 926 | 1.561 882 |
11 | -0.310 45 | -0.077 61 | 1.037 581 | 0.648 851 | 41 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.020 820 | 1.568 520 |
12 | -0.249 38 | -0.062 34 | 1.035 947 | 0.735 828 | 42 | -0.050 89 | -0.012 72 | 1.020 694 | 1.576 614 |
13 | -0.120 45 | -0.030 11 | 1.034 809 | 0.796 613 | 43 | -0.044 11 | -0.011 03 | 1.020 618 | 1.581 481 |
14 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.033 659 | 0.858 238 | 44 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.020 545 | 1.586 150 |
15 | -0.603 93 | -0.150 98 | 1.032 107 | 0.941 811 | 45 | 0.250 00 | 0 | 1.020 416 | 1.594 489 |
16 | -0.271 43 | -0.067 86 | 1.030 647 | 1.020 777 | 46 | -0.485 18 | -0.121 29 | 1.020 394 | 1.595 909 |
17 | -0.349 46 | -0.087 37 | 1.029 571 | 1.079 217 | 47 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.020 365 | 1.597 799 |
18 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.029 153 | 1.102 010 | 48 | -0.229 02 | -0.057 25 | 1.020 331 | 1.600 068 |
19 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.028 640 | 1.130 007 | 49 | -1.201 07 | -0.300 27 | 1.020 265 | 1.604 387 |
20 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.027 053 | 1.216 978 | 50 | 14.844 59 | -0.115 78 | 1.020 138 | 1.612 903 |
21 | -0.145 89 | -0.036 47 | 1.026 892 | 1.225 812 | 51 | 0.850 00 | -129.920 00 | 1.020 000 | 1.620 312 |
22 | -0.671 79 | -0.167 95 | 1.025 966 | 1.276 797 | 52 | -0.583 57 | -0.145 89 | 1.019 999 | 1.620 270 |
23 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.025 575 | 1.298 416 | 53 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.019 994 | 1.620 133 |
24 | -0.227 32 | -0.056 83 | 1.023 844 | 1.394 489 | 54 | -1.324 91 | -0.331 23 | 1.019 989 | 1.619 960 |
25 | -0.128 93 | -0.032 23 | 1.022 555 | 1.466 372 | 55 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.019 986 | 1.619 867 |
26 | -0.061 07 | -0.015 27 | 1.022 074 | 1.492 987 | 56 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.019 982 | 1.619 731 |
27 | -0.821 07 | -0.205 27 | 1.021 988 | 1.497 775 | 57 | -0.254 46 | -0.063 62 | 1.019 978 | 1.619 602 |
28 | -0.089 91 | -0.022 48 | 1.021 968 | 1.498 917 | 58 | -0.427 50 | -0.106 88 | 1.019 976 | 1.619 541 |
29 | -0.342 68 | -0.085 67 | 1.021 850 | 1.505 628 | 59 | -1.112 86 | -0.278 21 | 1.019 974 | 1.619 465 |
30 | -0.827 86 | -0.206 96 | 1.021 833 | 1.506 619 | 60 | -2.054 38 | -0.513 59 | 1.019 973 | 1.619 457 |
Table 2
Simulation results of energy flow in a thermal network ℃
节点 | 供热温度 | 回热温度 | 节点 | 供热温度 | 回热温度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 200.00 | 117.06 | 100 | 70.00 | 29.72 |
2 | 199.90 | 117.08 | 101 | 69.99 | 29.71 |
3 | 199.82 | 117.10 | 102 | 69.99 | 29.71 |
4 | 199.79 | 117.21 | 103 | 69.98 | 29.70 |
5 | 199.71 | 117.24 | 104 | 69.98 | 29.70 |
6 | 199.50 | 117.32 | 105 | 69.95 | 29.70 |
7 | 199.44 | 117.28 | 106 | 69.94 | 29.70 |
8 | 199.21 | 117.40 | 107 | 69.94 | 29.70 |
9 | 198.96 | 117.47 | 108 | 69.93 | 29.71 |
10 | 198.87 | 117.47 | 109 | 69.92 | 29.71 |
11 | 198.74 | 117.49 | 110 | 69.91 | 29.71 |
12 | 198.64 | 117.49 | 111 | 69.90 | 29.70 |
13 | 198.42 | 117.49 | 112 | 69.89 | 29.70 |
14 | 197.97 | 117.30 | 113 | 69.88 | 29.70 |
15 | 197.46 | 117.15 | 114 | 69.88 | 29.69 |
16 | 196.74 | 117.47 | 115 | 69.86 | 29.64 |
17 | 195.96 | 117.62 | 116 | 69.79 | 29.65 |
18 | 195.69 | 117.60 | 117 | 69.71 | 29.66 |
19 | 194.46 | 118.10 | 118 | 69.64 | 29.67 |
20 | 192.79 | 118.07 | 119 | 69.55 | 29.62 |
Table 3
Simulation results of energy flow in a gas pipeline kPa
节点 | 压力 | 节点 | 压力 | 节点 | 压力 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 500.0 | 21 | 484.1 | 41 | 480.7 |
2 | 498.4 | 22 | 483.6 | 42 | 480.6 |
3 | 498.1 | 23 | 483.2 | 43 | 480.6 |
4 | 497.9 | 24 | 483.0 | 44 | 480.5 |
5 | 496.1 | 25 | 482.9 | 45 | 480.5 |
6 | 494.3 | 26 | 482.4 | 46 | 480.5 |
7 | 493.3 | 27 | 482.3 | 47 | 480.5 |
8 | 493.1 | 28 | 482.1 | 48 | 480.5 |
9 | 491.5 | 29 | 481.8 | 49 | 480.4 |
10 | 490.8 | 30 | 481.8 | 50 | 480.4 |
11 | 490.3 | 31 | 481.8 | 51 | 480.3 |
12 | 489.0 | 32 | 481.6 | 52 | 498.4 |
13 | 488.9 | 33 | 481.5 | 53 | 498.4 |
14 | 488.8 | 34 | 481.2 | 54 | 498.4 |
15 | 488.0 | 35 | 481.1 | 55 | 498.4 |
16 | 487.3 | 36 | 480.9 | 56 | 498.4 |
17 | 486.7 | 37 | 480.9 | 57 | 497.9 |
18 | 485.9 | 38 | 480.9 | 58 | 497.9 |
19 | 485.2 | 39 | 480.9 | 59 | 497.9 |
20 | 484.4 | 40 | 480.8 | 60 | 497.9 |
[1] | 贾宏杰, 王丹, 徐宪东, 等. 区域综合能源系统若干问题研究[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015, 38(7):198-207. |
JIA Hongjie, WANG Dan, XU Xiandong, et al. Research on some key problems related to integrated energy systems[J]. Automation of Electric Power System, 2015, 38(7):198-207. | |
[2] | 袁智勇, 赵懿祺, 郭祚刚, 等. 面向能源互联网的综合能源系统规划研究综述[J]. 南方电网技术, 2019, 13(7):1-9. |
YUAN Zhiyong, ZHAO Yiqi, GUO Zuogang, et al. Research summary of integrated energy systems planning for energy internet[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2019, 13(7):1-9. | |
[3] |
张爱平, 赵利兴, 刘静. 楼宇型综合能源服务系统智能优化运行研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(2):42-48.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.02.007 |
ZHANG Aiping, ZHAO Lixing, LIU Jing. Research on optimized operation of building-type integrated energy service systems[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(2):42-48.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0706.2022.02.007 |
|
[4] | 金红光, 隋军, 徐聪, 等多能源互补的分布式冷热电联产系统理论与方法研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(12): 3150-3160. |
JIN Hongguang, SUI Jun, XU Cong, et al. Research on theory and method of muti-energy complementary distributed CCHP system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(12): 3150-3160. | |
[5] | 朱海东, 郝浩, 郑剑, 等. 基于冷热电多能互补的园区综合能源系统设计[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(4): 34-38. |
ZHU Haidong, HAO Hao, ZHENG Jian, et al. Design of integrated energy system for parks based on complementation of cold, heat and electricity[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(4): 34-38. | |
[6] | 吴江, 王晶晶, 张强, 等. 考虑电转气消纳风电的电-气综合能源系统两阶段鲁棒协同调度[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(2): 436-443. |
WU Jiang, WANG Jingjing, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Two-stage robust cooperative scheduling for electricity-gas integrated energy system considering power-to-gas for wind power accommodation[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(2): 436-443. | |
[7] | 赵瑞锋, 王海柱, 郭文鑫, 等. 含风电接入的区域综合能源系统电/热储能配置[J]. 南方电网技术, 2022, 16(4):68-77. |
ZHAO Ruifeng, WANG Haizhu, GUO Wenxin, et al. Power and heat storage configuration of regional integrated energy system with wind power integration[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2022, 16(4):68-77. | |
[8] | 钟俊杰, 李勇, 曾子龙, 等. 综合能源系统多能流准稳态分析与计算[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2019, 39(8):22-30. |
ZHONG Junjie, LI Yong, ZENG Zilong, et al. Quasi-steady-state analysis and calculation of multi-energy flow for integrated energy system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2019, 39(8):22-30. | |
[9] | 伍惠铖, 王淳, 刘宽, 等. 电-热综合能源系统能流的区间计算算法[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(1): 91-99. |
WU Huicheng, WANG Chun, LIU Kuan, et al. An interval energy flow calculation method for integrated electro-thermal energy system[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(1): 91-99. | |
[10] | 孙浩, 陈永华. 综合能源系统多能流联合仿真技术研究[J]. 华电技术, 2020, 42(5): 66-72. |
SUN Hao, CHEN Yonghua. Research on multiple energy flow co-simulation technology applied in integrated energy system[J]. Huadian Technology, 2020, 42(5): 66-72. | |
[11] | 胡枭, 尚策, 程浩忠, 等. 综合能源系统能流计算方法述评与展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(18): 179-191. |
HU Xiao, SHANG Ce, CHENG Haozhong, et al. Review and prospect of calculation method for energy flow in integrated energy system[J]. Automation of Electric Power System, 2020, 44(18): 179-191. | |
[12] | 孙浩, 傅金洲, 鄢小虎, 等. 区域综合能源仿真优化系统的研制[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(4): 8-13. |
SUN Hao, FU Jinzhou, YAN Xiaohu, et al. Research and development of integrated community energy simulation-optimization system[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(4): 8-13. | |
[13] |
KRAUSE T, ANDERSSON G, FROHLICH K, et al. Multiple-energy carriers: Modeling of production, delivery, and consumption[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2011, 99(1): 15-27.
doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2083610 |
[14] |
BOLLINGER L, DORER V. The ehub modeling tool: A flexible software package for district energy system optimization[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 122: 541-546.
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.402 |
[15] |
MARTINEZMARES A, FUERTE-ESQUIVEL C R. A unified gas and power flow analysis in natural gas and electricity coupled networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2012, 27: 2156-2166.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2191984 |
[16] |
赵霞, 戴蓉, 王骆, 等. 考虑压气站运行特性的电-气最优能流两阶段方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022. DOI: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.211921.
doi: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.211921 |
ZHAO Xia, DAI Rong, WANG Luo, et al. Two-stage method for optimal power-gas flow considering the operation characteristics of compressor station[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022.DOI: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.211921.
doi: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.211921 |
|
[17] | 郑重, 苗世洪, 赵海彭, 等. 一种新的电-气互联多区域综合能源系统最优能流计算方法[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(11): 117-124. |
ZHENG Zhong, MIAO Shihong, ZHAO Haipeng, et al. A new calculation method for optimal energy flow of multi-regional electricity-gas integrated energy system[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2021, 42(11): 117-124. | |
[18] | 胡宪法, 张树卿, 唐绍普, 等. 计及工质流和热传导的热力管网能流动态建模[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(12): 4198-4208. |
HU Xianfa, ZHANG Shuqing, TANG Shaopu, et al. Dynamic modeling of energy flow in heat supply network considering working fluid and heat conduction[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(12): 4198-4208. | |
[19] | LIU X. Combined analysis of electricity and heat networks[D]. Cardiff: Cardiff University, 2013. |
[20] | ZHAO H. Analysis, modeling and operational optimization of district heating systems[D]. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark, 1995. |
[21] |
DE WOLF D, SMEERS Y. The gas transmission problem solved by an extension of the simplex algorithm[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(11):1454-1465.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1454.12087 |
[22] | AN S, LI Q, GEDRA T W. Natural gas and electricity optimal power flow[C]// 2003 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.Dallas:IEEE, 2003:138-143. |
[1] | GAO Ming, CHEN Jiahao, WANG Lixiao, TANG Wuchen, WANG Zhidong, ZHANG Zifan, MA Haixia, FENG Ruijue, ZHOU Changpeng. A three-point probabilistic load flow estimation algorithm for the power system considering photovoltaic uncertainties [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 1-10. |
[2] | ZHONG Pengyuan, YANG Xiaohong, KOU Jianyu. Research on the optimal configuration of integrated energy systems for parks with hydrogen storage devices [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 11-19. |
[3] | HAN Shiwang, ZHAO Ying, ZHANG Xingyu, XUAN Chengbo, ZHAO Tiantian, HOU Xukai, LIU Qianqian. Researches on hydrogen storage peak-shaving technology for new power systems to achieve carbon neutrality [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 20-26. |
[4] | JIANG Ting, ZHAO Yajiao. Carbon emission reduction analysis for gas-based distributed integrated energy systems [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 27-32. |
[5] | ZHANG Xu, ZHANG Haohao, GU Jihao. Study on difference analysis and sampling inference methods of room temperature spatial characteristics [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 51-58. |
[6] | JIANG Shu, LIU Fangfang, LIU Yuanyuan, CHEN Qizhao, LIAN Li, REN Mengnan. Comprehensive cascade application of "geothermal energy +" in engineering practice [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 59-64. |
[7] | YU Guo, WU Jun, XIA Re, CHEN Yihui, GUO Zihui, HUANG Wenxin. Study on the status quo and development trend of grid-forming converter technology [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 65-70. |
[8] | TANG Qiwen, SHEN Qi, ZHU Jun, SU Yijing. Mechanism design and operation practice of Zhejiang frequency regulation ancillary service market [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(9): 71-77. |
[9] | HAN Qianwen, ZHANG Kun, CHEN Xiaoyang, ZHU Tenglong. Study on La/Ni co-doped SrTi0.35Fe0.65O3-δ symmetric electrode for H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis in SOECs [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(8): 43-47. |
[10] | YANG Ying, ZHANG Yanxiang, YAN Mufu. Research progress on preparation methods of medium and low temperature SOFC electrolytes [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(8): 50-57. |
[11] | CHEN Hanyu, ZHOU Xiaoliang, LIU Limin, QIAN Xinyuan, WANG Zhou, HE Feifan, SHENG Yang. Research progress of hydrogen production from water electrolysis in proton-conducting solid electrolytic cells [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(8): 75-85. |
[12] | LI Huijun, LU Jianqiang, ZHOU Xia, XIE Xiangpeng, WAN Lei. Network attack association analysis and attack protection strategy for smart park systems [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 1-9. |
[13] | LI Hua, ZHENG Hongwei, ZHOU Bowen, LI Guangdi, YANG Bo. Two-part tariff for pumped storage power plants in an integrated intelligent energy system [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 10-18. |
[14] | WANG Sheng, TAN Jian, SHI Wenbo, ZOU Fenghua, CHEN Guang, WANG Linyu, HUI Hongxun, GUO Lei. Practices of the new power system in the UK and inspiration for the development of provincial power systems in China [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 19-32. |
[15] | SUN Jian, QIN Yu, WANG Yinwu, WU Kexin, HAO Junhong, YANG Yongping. Study on the performance of new air-source high-temperature hot water units driven by heat supply network in integrated energy systems [J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(7): 33-39. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||